Works-council packs

All German-contracted roles in the fourteen functions, covering the sub-functions where an agent now holds a decision that a person held before. The pack is filed as a co-determination matter under section 87 paragraph 1 number 6 of the Works Constitution Act, on the reading that any system capable of measuring individual performance is co-determined whether or not the employer intends to use it that way.

Issued on 12 June with a twenty-one day response expectation. The response has not arrived and the pack is now well past that window. Nothing in the German estate can move to a higher autonomy stage until it does, which means agents whose evaluation evidence would otherwise support a promotion are held where they are.

All French-contracted roles across the fourteen functions. Filed as an information-consultation on a project modifying working conditions and work organization, together with the data protection notice required before any processing that observes how work is performed.

Favorable opinion delivered on 12 May 2026 with three conditions: the risk weighting used for quality sampling is disclosed to the CSE whenever it changes; the French monitoring notice is reissued to every employee within thirty days of any change to decision rights; and a joint review is held twelve months after go-live. All three conditions are recorded here, and the first is the reason the sampling weight is treated as a policy change rather than a configuration change.

Brazilian-contracted roles in the shared service and customer-facing sub-functions. The collective agreement in force requires negotiation before any change to how individual performance is evaluated, and the data protection authority has required specific clauses on automated processing since August 2024.

This pack has never been issued. It has sat in draft since 2 June while the Brazilian sub-functions continued to move, which makes Brazil the most exposed jurisdiction in the estate: there are live role transitions here whose consultation duty is binding and unmet. Nothing on this page changes that; it only makes it visible.

United Kingdom roles across the fourteen functions. There is no standing works-council duty here. The pack is issued because the redundancy consultation duty bites where twenty or more roles at one establishment are at risk, and because the forum was promised the same disclosure the German and French bodies receive.

The establishment question is unanswered and it is not a technicality: the redundancy threshold and therefore the length of the consultation period both depend on the answer. Employment counsel has the question and has not returned a view.

United States roles across all fourteen functions. There is no consultation duty of any kind here. The pack is issued voluntarily so that the largest affected population in the estate is not the least informed, and so that the same disclosure standard applies everywhere the program runs.

The largest affected population sits behind the weakest obligation. Everything in this pack is a promise rather than a duty, and the council has asked the one question that tests whether the promise is real.

Singapore roles, concentrated in the shared service tower. No statutory consultation duty applies. The pack is drafted to the same standard as the others.

Drafted on 15 June and not yet issued. There is no legal deadline, which is exactly why it keeps being deprioritized behind the jurisdictions that have one.

Australian roles, a small population spread across finance, procurement and customer service. Consultation obligations arise under the applicable modern award and enterprise agreement rather than from a works-council statute.

There is no pack. This record exists so that the absence is on the register rather than off it. The award consultation clause has not been read against the affected roles, no counterpart meeting has been requested, and the Australian transitions in the ledger are proceeding without any of that having happened.