Govern · item 17
Classification and sub-processors
Before anything can be governed it has to be named. Every class of record the estate holds is classified by what it is about and whose it is, with the lawful basis, the retention rule and the minimization commitment written against it. Underneath sits the register of every downstream processor that touches it — who they are, where they process, and what they were assessed against.
Health
What the estate holds and under what class
Record classes by compliance state, the volume held under each and the special-category exposure.
What the estate holds, by classification
Category drives the obligation. Special-category data needs a condition on top of a lawful basis, and the register says which.
Classification register
One row per class of record. Where the declared position and the observed position differ, the gap is written out rather than resolved in favor of the declaration.
Sub-processor register
Every downstream party that receives data from this estate, named — with where it processes, what it receives, and the outcome of its last assessment.
| Processor | Category | Purpose | Processes in | Receives | Agreement | Audit right | Last assessed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary model provider Critical criticality · HQ US | Model provider | Inference for every agent in the estate. Receives prompt content, which includes record extracts. | US | 5 classes | DPA-2025-014 signed 330 d ago | Report-based. No on-site audit right negotiated. | 41 d ago | Approved with conditions Approved with conditions. Zero-retention is contracted and attested annually; it is not independently verifiable by this platform. This is the highest-exposure processor in the register and the one with the weakest audit right. Everything an agent reads passes through it. |
Secondary model provider High criticality · HQ US | Model provider | Failover inference when the primary provider is unavailable or rate-limited. | USIE | 2 classes | DPA-2025-019 signed 288 d ago | Report-based, SOC 2 Type II shared annually. | 41 d ago | Approved Approved. EU region available and used for EEA-origin traffic. |
Applicant tracking vendor High criticality · HQ US | Software vendor | Hosts candidate applications, assessment results and interview records. | USSG transfers onward | 1 classes | DPA-2024-006 signed 652 d ago | Contractual on-site audit right, never exercised. | 94 d ago | Approved with conditions Approved with conditions. The vendor uses two onward processors for resume parsing and video interview hosting. The audit right exists and has never been used. An unexercised audit right is a contract clause, not an assurance. |
Resume parsing service High criticality · HQ US | Software vendor | Extracts structured fields from uploaded resumes on behalf of the applicant tracking vendor. | US | 1 classes | none on file | None. This is an onward processor; the relationship is with the applicant tracking vendor, not with us. | never | Not assessed Not assessed. Identified from the vendor sub-processor page during the 2026 review, not from any notification. A processor handling candidate resumes that we have never assessed and have no direct contract with. It was found by reading the vendor website. |
Video interview platform High criticality · HQ US | Software vendor | Hosts recorded and live interviews, and stores the recordings. | USDE | 1 classes special category | DPA-2025-021 signed 240 d ago | Report-based. | 94 d ago | Approved with conditions Approved with conditions. Facial analysis features are contractually disabled; the platform cannot verify they are off. Video recordings are biometric-adjacent. Contractual disablement of facial analysis is asserted by the vendor and not observable from here. |
Customer platform vendor Critical criticality · HQ US | Software vendor | Hosts customer contact records, opportunity and quoting data. | USDESGAU | 1 classes | DPA-2023-002 signed 1145 d ago | Report-based, ISO 27001 and SOC 2. | 348 d ago | Approved Approved. Regional instances configured. Sub-processor list refreshed twice since the last assessment. Last assessed 348 days ago against a sub-processor list that has changed twice since. |
Contact center vendor Critical criticality · HQ US | Software vendor | Voice, chat and email handling, plus transcript generation and storage. | USDESGAU transfers onward | 2 classes special category | DPA-2023-004 signed 1131 d ago | Report-based. | 348 d ago | Approved with conditions Approved with conditions. Speech-to-text runs through an onward processor. Transcripts carry whatever the customer says, including health and financial detail. Assessed as ordinary personal data. |
Speech recognition service High criticality · HQ US | Model provider | Converts recorded calls to text for the contact center vendor. | US | 1 classes special category | none on file | None. Onward processor of the contact center vendor. | never | Not assessed Not assessed. Named in the vendor sub-processor list; no direct relationship exists. Every recorded customer call in the estate passes through a processor we have never assessed. |
Core HR vendor Critical criticality · HQ US | Software vendor | Employee master, compensation, performance and payroll processing. | USNLSG | 3 classes | DPA-2024-001 signed 733 d ago | Contractual audit right plus annual third-party report. | 41 d ago | Approved Approved. EU pod confirmed for German and UK populations. |
Infrastructure provider Critical criticality · HQ US | Infrastructure | Hosts the platform, the ledger, the warehouse and the evidence spine. | USDEUKSGAU | 3 classes | DPA-2022-001 signed 1520 d ago | Report-based, full compliance program published. | 41 d ago | Approved Approved. Regions pinned per record class; no cross-region replication configured outside the declared routes. |
Marketing and analytics vendor Medium criticality · HQ US | Analytics | Campaign automation, digital analytics and attribution. | US | 1 classes | DPA-2026-002 signed 180 d ago | Report-based. | 41 d ago | Approved Approved under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, certification verified February 2026. |
Shared-service outsourcing partner Critical criticality · HQ SG | Outsourcing partner | Human staff in the Singapore hub who handle escalated transactions across all four towers. | SGIN transfers onward | 4 classes | DPA-2024-008 signed 690 d ago | On-site audit right, exercised October 2025. | 302 d ago | Approved with conditions Approved with conditions. Delivery staff in a second country were disclosed during the on-site audit and are now named here. Delivery from a second country was discovered during audit rather than disclosed in advance. The register now names it; the disclosure failure is not undone by that. |
Background screening vendor High criticality · HQ UK | Software vendor | Right-to-work verification and criminal record checks where lawful. | UKUSSG | 1 classes special category | DPA-2024-016 signed 590 d ago | Contractual audit right, exercised March 2026. | 41 d ago | Approved Approved. Criminal record checks are suppressed in jurisdictions where they are unlawful for the role. |
German payroll bureau High criticality · HQ DE | Payroll bureau | Statutory payroll filing and social contribution reporting for the German entity. | DE | 2 classes | DPA-2023-011 signed 980 d ago | On-site audit right, exercised annually by the German entity. | 128 d ago | Approved Approved. Data stays in Germany throughout. |
Processors carrying an open question
Named, not counted.
What the basis actually rests on
Lawful basis relied on across the transfer register.
Actions
What is waiting on a person
Every class below names a lawful basis, a residency rule and an owner. The queue is what is written down and not yet settled.
Answer an acknowledged gap
The class itself records something the team could not evidence.
Clear a class running under an exception
Held in a way the residency rule does not sanction, with a written reason.
Resolve an unclassified holding
The platform holds the data and the class does not yet say on what basis.
Re-confirm a special-category basis
Special-category data carries a higher bar and a shorter review cycle.
Operations
What this desk is allowed to start
A surface that only reports is not operable. This is the work this page can set in motion, and the bound it runs into.
Trigger and bound
This desk can define a class, attach a lawful basis and a retention code to it, and mark where it may physically sit. It cannot move the data: the residency rule written here is compared against the placements on the residency page, and a mismatch surfaces there as an unsanctioned placement rather than being corrected automatically.
Live observability
What the record shows right now
10 record classes covering 2,636,714 held records, 1 of them special category.
Current distribution
10 classes
Is policy and strategy coming to fruition
Whether the written intent is holding here
5 of 10 classes are clean; 5 are carrying a written exception or no answer at all.
Not holding on the record
The policy position is that nothing is held without a stated lawful basis, a named owner and a rule about where it may live. That statement is complete for 5 of 10 classes. The rest are honest about being wrong rather than quietly compliant: 4 run under an exception somebody wrote down, and 1 have no settled answer. None of these classes has been reviewed by external counsel, so what you are reading is the team's own classification of its own data.
The classification, the register and the assessment states are real structures against modeled holdings. The volumes are modeled. What the register demonstrates is whether the estate can name every downstream party and say what each one was assessed against — not that these particular parties were assessed.
2 of 14 sub-processors have no assessment on record and 2 have never been assessed at all. 2 operate without a processing agreement on file. They stay in the register with the gap visible rather than being removed until the paperwork catches up.
5 of 10 classes carry a declared exception, and 1 class is special category — the one where an ordinary lawful basis is not sufficient on its own.