LensReading which lens this session carries.

Closing it

What it would take

49 steps across 23 register entries. 26 of them are edits to records the platform already owns. 23 are not …

How long each step takes

Bands, never numbers. Nothing here has been timed.

Hours
21
Days
14
Weeks
7
Open ended
7
The four bands account for every step. 7 steps are open ended, which means it is a commitment rather than a piece of work and no band would be honest.

The one that holds up the rest

Derived from what each step waits on

RM-013 Source systems that have never returned a record

3 other entries have steps that cannot start until this one closes. It is the largest single item in the register and the least like software.

Every entry, in the order its own steps run

18 of 23 entries start with something the platform can do on its own

  1. 1List every unbound agent against the rule that should name itThe platformHours
  2. 2Read the proposed bindings and refuse the wrong onesIbrahim SyDays
  3. 3Write the accepted names into the binding listsThe platformHours
  1. 1Lower the ceiling on the agents past the gate until a rule names themIbrahim SyHours
  2. 2Bind, then restore the ceiling one agent at a timeThe platformDaysWaits on RM-001, which has not closed.
  1. 1Create a lifecycle record for every agent that has noneThe platformHours
  2. 2Point each record at an evaluation suiteIbrahim SyWeeks
  1. 1Queue the unchecked positions by what rests on themThe platformHours
  2. 2Check themChief ArchitectWeeks
  3. 3Record the verdict and the checkerThe platformHours
  1. 1Name a checking party that does not report into the authoring partyWhoever sets the reporting linesOpen ended
  2. 2Re-run the self-checks under the new partyThe platformDaysWaits on the step above it in the same entry.
  1. 1Group the conflicts by the person holding both dutiesThe platformHours
  2. 2Take one duty away, or sign a compensating controlGroup Financial ControllerWeeks
  1. 1Present each class as a worklist rather than a numberThe platformHours
  2. 2Name an owner for each retention classNobody is named on these recordsOpen ended
  3. 3Review and disposeNobody is named on these recordsWeeksWaits on the step above it in the same entry.
  1. 1Connect the systems the inferred facts came fromWhoever owns the source systemsOpen endedWaits on RM-013, which has not closed.
  2. 2Re-extract and raise the confidenceThe platformDaysWaits on RM-013, which has not closed.
  1. 1Route each held record to the owner already named on itThe platformHours
  2. 2Release or refuseN. FerreiraDays
  1. 1Put the priced gap in front of both function leadersThe platformHours
  2. 2Agree which function owns the gapNobody is named on these handoffsOpen ended
  1. 1Show both counts side by side with the method that produced eachThe platformHours
  2. 2Explain the difference or accept the sourceA. WhitfieldDays
  1. 1Run the comparisonThe platformHoursWaits on RM-013, which has not closed.
  1. 1Choose which systems to connect firstThe platformHours
  2. 2Fund and staff the integrationWhoever funds the integration workOpen ended
  3. 3Move each system to live and re-measure everything drawn from itThe platformWeeksWaits on the step above it in the same entry.
  1. 1Refuse to treat an unattested acceptance as evidenceThe platformHours
  2. 2Get a named person to signNils AndersenDays
  1. 1Put the inferred process in front of the function that would be doing itThe platformHours
  2. 2Confirm or refuse itSofia KalogeropoulouDays
  3. 3Model the confirmed onesThe platformWeeksWaits on the step above it in the same entry.
  1. 1Publish the unseen volume per function with its uncertainty bandThe platformHours
  2. 2Connect the systems carrying the unseen volume, or ask the people doing itWhoever owns the source systemsOpen endedWaits on RM-013, which has not closed.
  1. 1Show every failed position beside the record that is missingThe platformHours
  2. 2Write down what was learned, including that nothing changedGrace Abbott, Head of Internal AuditDays
  1. 1Send the notice to a person rather than writing a rowThe platformDays
  2. 2Withdraw or restate the positionChief ArchitectWeeks
  1. 1Show the cost of the delay and what is blocked behind itThe platformHours
  2. 2DecideAvery ChenDays
RM-020Service levels being missedA commitment
  1. 1Show the measured attainment against the committed targetThe platformHours
  2. 2Add capacity, change the target, or pay the penaltyThe parties to the commitmentOpen ended
  1. 1Call the review the commitment already asks forMorgan IdrisDays
  2. 2Record the outcome against the commitmentThe platformHours
  1. 1Age the queue and show what each escalation is holding upThe platformHours
  2. 2Answer themRafael AchebeDays
  1. 1Work the exception queue that already existsAcme Identity and Access ManagementDays

Who is being waited on

Names taken from the register entries, not assigned here

Ibrahim SyA person3
Chief ArchitectA person2
Nobody is named on these recordsA commitment2
Whoever owns the source systemsA commitment2
A. WhitfieldA person1
Acme Identity and Access ManagementA person1
Avery ChenA person1
Grace Abbott, Head of Internal AuditA person1
Group Financial ControllerA person1
Morgan IdrisA person1
N. FerreiraA person1
Nils AndersenA person1
Nobody is named on these handoffsA commitment1
Rafael AchebeA person1
Sofia KalogeropoulouA person1
The parties to the commitmentA commitment1
Whoever funds the integration workA commitment1
Whoever sets the reporting linesA commitment1
18 parties are waited on across 23 steps. The platform can route every one of them and hold every answer. It cannot supply one.

What no software closes

7 entries in the register

Independence is a second person who does not report into the first.
A fact becomes a read rather than an inference when the system that owns it is connected.
Naming the owner of the gap between two functions is a decision two function leaders have to reach.
A comparison cannot run against a system that is not connected.
This is the root of most of the register.
RM-016Items a week that the platform has never seen15,628 of 200,240 items a week
Unseen volume becomes seen when the systems carrying it are connected or the people doing it tell us.
RM-020Service levels being missed12 of 28 service levels
A missed level is closed by capacity, by a changed target, or by paying the penalty.
30% of the register sits here. The register itself

Actions

What is waiting on a person

A sequence is only useful if it says where it stops.

Operations

What this desk is allowed to start

A surface that only reports is not operable.

Trigger and bound

This surface holds a written sequence for every entry on the register …

Live observability

What the record shows right now

All 49 closure steps across 23 entries, split 3 ways by who has to do the work.

Current distribution

49 closure steps

The platform does it2653%
A named person does it1633%
The organization does it714%

Is policy and strategy coming to fruition

Whether the written intent is holding here

Not yet. The sequence exists for every entry and not one step has been recorded as done.

Not holding on the record

The written intent is that the platform should be specific about what closing a finding costs rather than leaving it as an owner and a date.

What is judgment here and what is not

The steps are a plan, and a plan is a judgment.

The limit of the product

Some entries cannot be closed by software at all.