Govern · works-council pack · WCP-AU-01
Australia: consultation on agent-assisted work
Generated Jun 18, 2026 from the role-transition ledger. more
The pack
Issued by Yolanda Reeves to Employee Representative Committee. more
Scope and basis
Australian roles, a small population spread across finance, procurement and customer service. more
Employee Representative Committee
Bruce Tarrant · Delegate, Employee Representative Committee
Yolanda Reeves
Chief Human Resources Officer
Generated Jun 18, 2026
Not yet issued
No response date set
Affected roles
Every sub-function in Australia whose work changes, grouped by function. The role after is the job as it will be written in the job architecture, not a description of the same job with fewer people in it.
| Sub-function | Role before | Role after | People | Redeployed | Unplaced | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier-1 Resolution | Tier-1 Resolution Processing Analyst | Control Tester, Tier-1 Resolution | 51 → 26 | 0 | 24 | Blocked |
| Sub-function | Role before | Role after | People | Redeployed | Unplaced | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering Analytics | Engineering Analytics Specialist | Escalation Owner, Engineering Analytics | 11 → 7 | 4 | 0 | Complete |
| Sub-function | Role before | Role after | People | Redeployed | Unplaced | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budgeting & Forecasting | Budgeting & Forecasting Specialist | Exception Judgment Lead, Budgeting & Forecasting | 21 → 15 | 4 | 2 | In consultation |
| Finance Systems | Finance Systems Processing Analyst | Finance Systems Specialist — widened scope | 50 → 29 | 20 | 0 | Complete |
| Sub-function | Role before | Role after | People | Redeployed | Unplaced | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network | Network Specialist | Process Designer, Network | 40 → 21 | 0 | 18 | Blocked |
| Sub-function | Role before | Role after | People | Redeployed | Unplaced | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content Studio | Content Studio Processing Analyst | Agent Supervisor, Content Studio | 52 → 36 | 0 | 15 | Not started |
| Customer Advocacy | Customer Advocacy Processing Analyst | Control Tester, Customer Advocacy | 52 → 39 | 12 | 0 | Complete |
| Sub-function | Role before | Role after | People | Redeployed | Unplaced | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payment Interlock | Payment Interlock Specialist | Scenario Analyst, Payment Interlock | 26 → 15 | 8 | 2 | In consultation |
| Sub-function | Role before | Role after | People | Redeployed | Unplaced | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billing Interlock | Billing Interlock Processing Analyst | Billing Interlock Specialist — widened scope | 52 → 27 | 25 | 0 | Not started |
139 full-time equivalents come off the old work in this jurisdiction. 72 have a named destination, 6 are expected to leave through natural attrition, and 61 have no destination written. 2 sub-functions have no transition record started at all.
Changed decision rights
This is the clause a works council actually argues about: not how many people, but who decides. more
Monitoring commitments
What the company will and will not measure about a person once agents are doing part of their work. more
Appeal route
Any employee whose work is routed, scored or escalated by an agent may ask for the decision to be re-made by a named human within five working days. more
Open questions and outcome
No questions have been raised, because the pack has not been issued.
There is no pack. more
Other jurisdictions
The same generator, run against the same ledger, filtered to a different jurisdiction.
These packs are assembled from the live ledger rather than typed by hand, which is the point. more
This pack covers 9 roles and 139 full-time equivalents in Australia. It was generated, not written: change a transition record on the role transitions page and this document changes with it. It has never been issued, so nothing in it has been put to anybody.
Consultation is not legally required in Australia. This pack exists because the estate is the same everywhere and issuing a document only where the law forces you to is how a company loses the argument in the jurisdictions where it does.