Govern · agent risk record · Human Resources
Calibration Prep Agent
depth-agent
The German population is excluded pending the works council agreement, so the readings shown cover four jurisdictions out of five.
Classification
Why this agent sits in this class, under which regime
Human oversight
The measure, and the person it is attached to
How an affected person contests this
The route, the named human at the end of it, and the service level
| Reference | Subject | Grounds | Routed to | Age | Review | Outcome | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APL-0012 Open | EMP-11603 employee · UK · HR case management | Employee contests the evidence selection in their calibration pack. | Priya Raman Chief People Officer | 96h of 240h | — human time | Pending | HR3B-1010 #1 |
APL-0005 Closed | EMP-10442 employee · SG · HR case management | Employee contests an outlier flag raised in the calibration pack. | Priya Raman Chief People Officer | 151h of 240h | 71m human time | Overturned The flag rested on goal data that had not been updated after a mid-year role change. Flag withdrawn and the rating stood unchanged. | HR5B-1009 #5 |
Adverse-impact readings behind this agent
Performance calibration preparation · Aug 2026
| Cohort | Compared with | n | Selection rate | Reference rate | Impact ratio | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40 to 49 age-band | 30 to 39 | 961 | 21.5% | 22.2% | 0.97 | Within threshold 40 to 49 is selected at 97 percent of the rate for 30 to 39. |
50 and over age-band | 30 to 39 | 585 | 19.9% | 22.8% | 0.87 | Within threshold 50 and over is selected at 87 percent of the rate for 30 to 39. |
Under 30 age-band | 30 to 39 | 1,129 | 22.5% | 22.1% | 1.02 | Within threshold Under 30 is selected at 102 percent of the rate for 30 to 39. |
Minority ethnic groups, aggregated Ethnicity | Majority group (per local reporting standard) | 1,296 | 21.0% | 22.6% | 0.93 | Within threshold Minority ethnic groups, aggregated is selected at 93 percent of the rate for Majority group (per local reporting standard). |
Women Gender | Men | 1,839 | 20.3% | 21.4% | 0.95 | Within threshold Women is selected at 95 percent of the rate for Men. |
Under 2 years tenure-band | 2 to 5 years | 1,421 | 19.7% | 21.6% | 0.91 | Within threshold Under 2 years is selected at 91 percent of the rate for 2 to 5 years. |
Over 10 years tenure-band | 2 to 5 years | 711 | 23.1% | 22.8% | 1.01 | Within threshold Over 10 years is selected at 101 percent of the rate for 2 to 5 years. |
Open alarms on this decision point
Derived from the readings, never authored by hand
What this record is, and what it is not
Read this before quoting anything above
Fairness readings computed on modeled data demonstrate the instrument, not a real audit result. The classification, the oversight measure, the explanation surface and the appeal route are design decisions recorded here so they can be argued with; the population behind the readings is modeled.
No agent on this register carries an independent third-party conformity assessment. Every assessment on file was made by the operator.
Appeal outcomes are recorded against the evidence spine where a unit reference exists. Where the evidence column reads “not recorded”, the appeal was resolved outside the spine and that is a gap, not a rounding.