RM-009 · Data quality

Records held out of the run

67 of 171 records — 39% of the population. Quarantine records are counted by status. A record at quarantined has failed a rule and nobody has looked at it. A named person has to act.

Back to the register

Outstanding

records of 171

State

Part of the population is moving

28 further records are in review, so the queue is being worked; these 67 are still untouched.

Who closes it

A person

A named person has to act

First seen

2026-08-09

The earliest record still held.

Platform date

2026-09-08

22 days away, and nobody has agreed to it

Where this entry came from

The query, run against the platform's own records

Quarantine records are counted by status. A record at quarantined has failed a rule and nobody has looked at it.

The earliest record still held.

The records this counts

Who carries it

Taken from the records, never assigned

N. Ferreira · Data owner

The owner named on the largest number of quarantined records.

Thirty days from the first observation. The platform set this date; nobody has agreed to it.

What it would take to close this

2 steps, none of them blocked

1Route each held record to the owner already named on itHours

These records carry an owner. The platform is not routing them today; it is holding them.

The platform · Routing over existing records.

2Release or refuseDays

A held record is a judgment about whether the data is good enough to run on.

N. Ferreira · Sixty-seven judgments across the named owners.

1 step waits on somebody outside this platform. The same question across the whole register

Everything recorded against it

Each line is a record, not a note

The platform saw it2026-08-09

The platform · counted 67

Quarantine records are counted by status. A record at quarantined has failed a rule and nobody has looked at it.

An owner was taken from the records2026-08-17

The platform

N. Ferreira was taken from the records, not assigned. The owner named on the largest number of quarantined records.

A date was set by the platform2026-08-17

The platform

Thirty days from the first observation, applied to every entry in the register without exception. Nobody has agreed to this date.

Measured again2026-08-17

The platform · counted 67

28 further records are in review, so the queue is being worked; these 67 are still untouched.

Every line above was written by the platform. Nobody has touched this entry.

What it is tangled with

Dependencies taken from the steps, not asserted

Waits on

No other entry. Its first step can start today.

Holds up

No other entry is waiting on this one.

Alongside it in Data quality

This is the only entry in its register.

Nobody agreed to this date

Every date on this page came from the same rule: thirty days from the first time the platform could see the gap. The platform set it. Nobody has agreed to any of them, no counterparty has been told, and none of them is a commitment. They are here so that an entry cannot sit without a clock against it, and they should be replaced by real dates the moment somebody accepts one.