LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Proposal at price

Sales · Solution & Proposal · line SL5B · Standard Proposal. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
SL5B-1002
Subject
Owen Baptiste
Requested by
Ethan Ito
Value
$88k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
O2C spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Solution Consulting
Orchestrator
Proposal Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Requirements Extraction AgentgbsCleared

Cleared capture need

2026-08-18 04:48:00ZAuthority SL5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 534adbeb...65ef5cout 05373999...a8d98dartifact ART-SL5B-1000-1 genesis fcca5d96...2a7bf9
2
Requirements Extraction AgentgbsCleared

Cleared configure

2026-08-18 06:12:00ZAuthority SL5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in ded7773f...6106eaout b748caca...b88895artifact ART-SL5B-1000-2 fcca5d96...2a7bf9 f78d08ff...1be469
3
Requirements Extraction AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at price

2026-08-18 07:36:00ZAuthority SL5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 0d1d85fd...0e62e1out 5ef0ca60...184226artifact ART-SL5B-1000-3 f78d08ff...1be469 5e368d96...2b906c

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

SL5-AUTH-A1ActiveProposal Orchestrator

Any unit on a solution & proposal line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Solution ConsultingExpires 2026-10-18

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policycustomer-commitmentsv5currentChief revenue officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Seller review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the proposal decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Solution Consulting · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

CUST-5Y5 years
Customer commitment and service evidence
Consumer claim windows and revenue recognition audit trail.
Deleted at five years from the last account activity.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.