LensReading which lens this session carries.
SL5B-1002Evidence postedmedium materiality

Proposal at price

Owen Baptiste

Sales · Solution & Proposal · SL5B Standard Proposal

$88k

value

72%

confidence

26

people affected

4h 12m

age

4h 3m

sla

50%

progress

Currently held by

O2C spine

Running in the shared AI GBS spine

Raised by

Ethan Ito

Requester of record

At station

Price

AI GBS layer · station 3 of 6

Where this train is on the line

SL5BStandard ProposalTransactional · 6 stations

Capture need

13 q

Configure

17 q

Price

1 live

Draft

6 q

Seller review

2 q

Send

35 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared capture need

    -252m

    Requirements Extraction Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared configure

    -168m

    Requirements Extraction Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Holding at price

    -84m

    Requirements Extraction Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Draft

run by Proposal Drafting Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 4h 12m against a commitment of 4h 3m · 104% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 26 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 9m · 26 people or records downstream of this decision