LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Lead at return to marketing

Sales · Demand Qualification · line SL3C · Recycle & Nurture. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
SL3C-1045
Subject
Rafael Ito
Requested by
Victor Novak
Value
$46k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Qualification Orchestrator (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Demand Development
Orchestrator
Qualification Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Lead Enrichment AgentgbsCleared

Cleared disqualify

2026-08-18 05:18:00ZAuthority SL3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in acd7291f...a086d6out 04418f78...4b5c85artifact ART-SL3C-1006-1 genesis 93b6a4bc...8d7b62
2
Fit Scoring AgenttaskCleared

Cleared reason code

2026-08-18 06:32:00ZAuthority SL3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in a6c5489e...561259out 4968286d...6241ccartifact ART-SL3C-1006-2 93b6a4bc...8d7b62 9e0c2b99...9e0ea8
3
Intent Signal AgentobserveIn progress

Holding at return to marketing

2026-08-18 07:46:00ZAuthority SL3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in d4cdb9e6...e147c6out 3aafff5c...d86d14artifact ART-SL3C-1006-3 9e0c2b99...9e0ea8 3ffeaeab...bd0e4e

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

SL3-AUTH-A1ActiveQualification Orchestrator

Any unit on a demand qualification line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Demand DevelopmentExpires 2027-01-09

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policycustomer-commitmentsv5currentChief revenue officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

CUST-5Y5 years
Customer commitment and service evidence
Consumer claim windows and revenue recognition audit trail.
Deleted at five years from the last account activity.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.