LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Cost line at owner review

Information Technology · IT Financial Management · line IT11A · Monthly Showback. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
1
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
IT11A-1000
Subject
Ines Novak
Requested by
Beatriz Achebe
Value
$627k
Materiality
high
Currently held by
Director, IT Financial Management (human)
Sub-function owner
Director, IT Financial Management
Orchestrator
IT Finance Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Cost Attribution AgentgbsCleared

Cleared attribute cost

2026-08-16 01:21:00ZAuthority IT11-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in a7916ceb...9a6fa1out b336d525...7b9e61artifact ART-IT11A-1000-1 genesis 02fef85e...55feea
2
Cost Attribution AgentgbsCleared

Cleared allocate to business

2026-08-16 15:16:00ZAuthority IT11-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 243b40e9...5a9ba1out 02a1f2ee...3e3ba1artifact ART-IT11A-1000-2 02fef85e...55feea 38731d93...cf2131
3
Budget Tracking AgenttaskCleared

Cleared draft readout

2026-08-17 05:10:00ZAuthority IT11-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 41fc8e5c...b2d5cfout 320ec8ec...7e31fdartifact ART-IT11A-1000-3 38731d93...cf2131 37325795...799c0a
4
IT Finance OrchestratororchestratorRefused

Attempted clearance above the delegated cap

2026-08-17 19:02:00ZAuthority IT11-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in d0a142de...02705cout 59921d9f...b995d1artifact ART-IT11A-4-refusal 37325795...799c0a f5f09be2...c07692
5
Director, IT Financial Managementgate-approverHeld

Holding at owner review

2026-08-17 19:05:00ZAuthority IT11-AUTH-H1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention TECH-3Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in 2fa65dfb...e77ec0out d05afade...c2f3c0artifact ART-IT11A-1000-5 f5f09be2...c07692 d2caa7a9...4b0ef1

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

IT11-AUTH-A1ActiveIT Finance Orchestrator

Any unit on a it financial management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Director, IT Financial ManagementExpires 2027-04-30
IT11-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, IT Financial Management

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Information Technology leadershipExpires 2026-12-24

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Owner review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the cost line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, IT Financial Management · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.
AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.