LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Review at outcome

Human Resources · Performance Management · line HR5C · PIP Lifecycle.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
3
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR5C-1023
Subject
Beatriz Bianchi
Requested by
Aaron Petrov
Value
$75k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Bias Language Monitor (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Performance & Talent
Orchestrator
Performance Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Director, Performance & Talentgate-approverCleared

Cleared legal check

2026-08-18 03:51:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in a2172375...39e272out 3465bc57...632f7aartifact ART-HR5C-1003-1 genesis → 28e7cb91...330dc0
2
Director, Performance & Talentgate-approverCleared

Cleared manager decision

2026-08-18 04:53:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 1e5f8570...9fb40eout 68efea5e...541820artifact ART-HR5C-1003-2 28e7cb91...330dc0 → d0c2198f...25cb00
3
PIP Drafting AgenttaskCleared

Cleared plan draft

2026-08-18 05:55:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A1Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in f69b81a9...a47e72out 274fa0e0...44f536artifact ART-HR5C-1003-3 d0c2198f...25cb00 → 37ea0216...2f7ac6
4
Rating Distribution MonitorpolicyCleared

Cleared monitor

2026-08-18 06:56:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A1Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
gate-approval@p8
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in c232fdfa...a5b628out 78d918d8...97fa9bartifact ART-HR5C-1003-4 37ea0216...2f7ac6 → 1dc77ecb...558cc2
5
Director, Performance & Talentgate-approverIn progress

Holding at outcome

2026-08-18 07:58:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 72b138d5...a601d0out 1aa94a58...62f3faartifact ART-HR5C-1003-5 1dc77ecb...558cc2 → 8abac492...9e1681

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR5-AUTH-A1ActivePerformance Orchestrator

Any unit on a performance management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Performance & TalentExpires 2027-04-22
HR5-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Performance & Talent

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-06-27

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
promptgate-approvalp8currentGovernance office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Legal check
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Performance & Talent · not reached
Manager decision
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Performance & Talent · not reached
Outcome
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Performance & Talent · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.