LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Onboarding case at payroll setup

Human Resources · Onboarding · line HR3A · Offer-to-Productive. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR3A-1045
Subject
Nadia Ito
Requested by
Mei Rhodes
Value
$8k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
H2R spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Employee Experience
Orchestrator
Onboarding Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Pre-boarding Comms AgentgbsCleared

Cleared contract

2026-08-18 02:58:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 1f2e7deb...3f9e26out 5cd5bcad...a77680artifact ART-HR3A-1006-1 genesis 1305d17f...c2e2f2
2
Provisioning Coordination AgenttaskCleared

Cleared compliance pack

2026-08-18 04:10:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in ada7bd9a...7c780aout b98363ea...08a13bartifact ART-HR3A-1006-2 1305d17f...c2e2f2 86fd4917...eaffa2
3
Director, Employee Experienceaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared right-to-work check

2026-08-18 05:23:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 3cc794e5...b78239out be6a9f47...1b9ab2artifact ART-HR3A-1006-3 86fd4917...eaffa2 8cc2d4fc...87edb3
4
Day-1 Readiness AgenttaskCleared

Cleared provision it

2026-08-18 06:35:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in c2dd0e4f...5a8f49out ed793673...7f24e7artifact ART-HR3A-1006-4 8cc2d4fc...87edb3 819df354...6268c3
5
Pre-boarding Comms AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at payroll setup

2026-08-18 07:48:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 78b91a09...3a6f99out 200d8187...239ff5artifact ART-HR3A-1006-5 819df354...6268c3 8d7b233e...dd66ee

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR3-AUTH-A1ActiveOnboarding Orchestrator

Any unit on a onboarding line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Employee ExperienceExpires 2027-06-01
HR3-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Employee Experience

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $25,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2026-10-12

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Right-to-work check
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the onboarding case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Employee Experience · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.