LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Listening cycle at re-identification check

Human Resources · Culture & Engagement · line HR10A · Engagement Survey Cycle.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 6 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
6
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
2
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
1
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR10A-1017
Subject
Amara Sandoval
Requested by
Owen Ito
Value
$70k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Sentiment Sensing Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Culture & Engagement
Orchestrator
Culture Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Sentiment Sensing AgentobserveCleared

Cleared design

2026-08-18 03:53:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in c02e130b...97f108out 6cf18a88...ebc6abartifact ART-HR10A-1002-1 genesis → a3ae06bb...d414de
2
Director, Culture & Engagementaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared works council clear

2026-08-18 04:54:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in a936d065...afafb4out 25363380...51ffefartifact ART-HR10A-1002-2 a3ae06bb...d414de → 48ab4d55...7019c8
3
Action Plan TrackergbsCleared

Cleared field

2026-08-18 05:56:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 63c0b40b...5dee51out 73693ac1...159d1fartifact ART-HR10A-1002-3 48ab4d55...7019c8 → 6e41ad29...37030e
4
Action Plan TrackergbsCleared

Cleared synthesize themes

2026-08-18 06:57:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 098a41d0...6766e9out 4570e681...37a2b5artifact ART-HR10A-1002-4 6e41ad29...37030e → 3434371b...237780
5
Recognition Program AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at re-identification check

2026-08-18 07:59:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 0c70a5da...84955cout a0889f56...0d4a87artifact ART-HR10A-1002-5 3434371b...237780 → 33ea7a4c...a41f1e
6
Director, Culture & Engagementaccountable-ownerCorrectioncorrects #4

Correction posted against record 4

An input was read from a stale reference and the earlier record states the wrong figure. The earlier record stands unaltered; this record carries the corrected figure and the reason.

2026-08-18 08:01:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in db0ee407...6c7f22out 395b1199...aded1dartifact ART-HR10A-1002-correction 33ea7a4c...a41f1e → a5c5f472...9ac4ef

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR10-AUTH-A1ActiveCulture Orchestrator

Any unit on a culture & engagement line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Director, Culture & EngagementExpires 2026-12-07
HR10-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Culture & Engagement

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-07-02

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Works council clear
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the listening cycle decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Culture & Engagement · not reached
Leader readout
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the listening cycle decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Culture & Engagement · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.