LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Listening cycle at re-identification check

Human Resources · Culture & Engagement · line HR10A · Engagement Survey Cycle. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 6 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
6
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
2
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
1
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR10A-1017
Subject
Amara Sandoval
Requested by
Owen Ito
Value
$70k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Sentiment Sensing Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Culture & Engagement
Orchestrator
Culture Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Sentiment Sensing AgentobserveCleared

Cleared design

2026-08-18 03:53:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in c02e130b...97f108out 6cf18a88...ebc6abartifact ART-HR10A-1002-1 genesis a3ae06bb...d414de
2
Director, Culture & Engagementaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared works council clear

2026-08-18 04:54:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in a936d065...afafb4out 25363380...51ffefartifact ART-HR10A-1002-2 a3ae06bb...d414de 48ab4d55...7019c8
3
Action Plan TrackergbsCleared

Cleared field

2026-08-18 05:56:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 63c0b40b...5dee51out 73693ac1...159d1fartifact ART-HR10A-1002-3 48ab4d55...7019c8 6e41ad29...37030e
4
Action Plan TrackergbsCleared

Cleared synthesize themes

2026-08-18 06:57:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 098a41d0...6766e9out 4570e681...37a2b5artifact ART-HR10A-1002-4 6e41ad29...37030e 3434371b...237780
5
Recognition Program AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at re-identification check

2026-08-18 07:59:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 0c70a5da...84955cout a0889f56...0d4a87artifact ART-HR10A-1002-5 3434371b...237780 33ea7a4c...a41f1e
6
Director, Culture & Engagementaccountable-ownerCorrectioncorrects #4

Correction posted against record 4

An input was read from a stale reference and the earlier record states the wrong figure. The earlier record stands unaltered; this record carries the corrected figure and the reason.

2026-08-18 08:01:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in db0ee407...6c7f22out 395b1199...aded1dartifact ART-HR10A-1002-correction 33ea7a4c...a41f1e a5c5f472...9ac4ef

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR10-AUTH-A1ActiveCulture Orchestrator

Any unit on a culture & engagement line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Director, Culture & EngagementExpires 2026-12-07
HR10-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Culture & Engagement

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-07-02

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Works council clear
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the listening cycle decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Culture & Engagement · not reached
Leader readout
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the listening cycle decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Culture & Engagement · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.