LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Service review at frame question

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Service Delivery Management · line GB9D · Service Delivery Model Position. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 1 record were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
1
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
1
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
GB9D-1012
Subject
Maeve Whitfield
Requested by
Sofia Lindqvist
Value
$26.7m
Materiality
critical
Currently held by
Stakeholder Reporting Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Head of Service Delivery
Orchestrator
Service Delivery Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
SLA Monitoring AgentobserveIn progress

Holding at frame question

2026-08-15 17:15:00ZAuthority GB9-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 4d1c0135...ac7a52out 0f435eed...467cdaartifact ART-GB9D-1001-1 genesis 75a6db9e...3749d4

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

GB9-AUTH-A1ActiveService Delivery Orchestrator

Any unit on a service delivery management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Head of Service DeliveryExpires 2027-05-09

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the service review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Head of Service Delivery · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.