LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Service review at challenge

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Service Delivery Management · line GB9D · Service Delivery Model Position. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
5
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
GB9D-1006
Subject
Marcus Sorensen
Requested by
Marcus Novak
Value
$19.1m
Materiality
critical
Currently held by
Stakeholder Reporting Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Head of Service Delivery
Orchestrator
Service Delivery Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
SLA Monitoring AgentobserveCleared

Cleared frame question

2026-08-15 04:31:00ZAuthority GB9-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 1cda1bec...776897out 4d9a7c6a...47a33fartifact ART-GB9D-1000-1 genesis a4daae89...898431
2
Capacity Balancing AgenttaskCleared

Cleared gather evidence

2026-08-15 19:49:00ZAuthority GB9-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 4a797926...7fad86out a5514d8a...59df73artifact ART-GB9D-1000-2 a4daae89...898431 b13013de...f605c0
3
Escalation Management AgenttaskCleared

Cleared model options

2026-08-16 11:07:00ZAuthority GB9-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 21beed73...0da3f4out cc4fccdc...d4cfc4artifact ART-GB9D-1000-3 b13013de...f605c0 8cef1621...9ffeb5
4
Stakeholder Reporting AgenttaskCleared

Cleared draft position

2026-08-17 02:24:00ZAuthority GB9-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in cda0f083...1e5b27out 513ac07d...791422artifact ART-GB9D-1000-4 8cef1621...9ffeb5 6db392b4...d955c9
5
Incident Coordination AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at challenge

2026-08-17 17:42:00ZAuthority GB9-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in ab168ef5...b2b3f3out b7788b55...48afebartifact ART-GB9D-1000-5 6db392b4...d955c9 95c63390...0d502e

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

GB9-AUTH-A1ActiveService Delivery Orchestrator

Any unit on a service delivery management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Head of Service DeliveryExpires 2027-05-09

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the service review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Head of Service Delivery · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.