LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Budget line at model impact

Finance · Budgeting & Forecasting · line FI2C · Reallocation Request. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-001

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
FI2C-1009
Subject
Daniel Sandoval
Requested by
Kofi Ellery
Value
$36k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Consolidation Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Budgeting
Orchestrator
Budget Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Budget Build AgentgbsCleared

Cleared request

2026-08-18 04:52:00ZAuthority FI2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 16ec4d44...5f19b5out 8ebced3d...563fcfartifact ART-FI2C-1001-1 genesis fc14d4c0...fea7be
2
Budget Build AgentgbsCleared

Cleared policy screen

2026-08-18 06:15:00ZAuthority FI2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in b4b8dd67...4d0f79out 42e902bc...21ee26artifact ART-FI2C-1001-2 fc14d4c0...fea7be 89872266...91046c
3
Assumption Tracking AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at model impact

2026-08-18 07:37:00ZAuthority FI2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 196b0ae5...35d2a8out 1e3368d2...8e8991artifact ART-FI2C-1001-3 89872266...91046c 8fd2b067...b76b8f

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

FI2-AUTH-A1ActiveBudget Orchestrator

Any unit on a budgeting & forecasting line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Director, BudgetingExpires 2026-12-05

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the budget line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Budgeting · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

FIN-7Y7 years
Financial assertion evidence
Statutory accounting retention in the majority of operating jurisdictions, aligned to the longest applicable period rather than the shortest.
Deleted at seven years from the close of the reporting period, provided no legal hold is in force on the record or its unit.
HOLD-001active
Regulatory inquiry — cross-border payment routing
A regulator has asked how payments above the cross-border band were authorized in the two quarters before the materiality policy moved to v9. Deletion is suspended across the whole function rather than a narrower scope, because the inquiry has not yet named the lines it will examine.
Custodian Group General Counsel · requested by External counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.