LensReading which lens this session carries.
FI2C-1009In flightlow materiality

Budget line at model impact

Daniel Sandoval

Finance · Budgeting & Forecasting · FI2C Reallocation Request

$36k

value

97%

confidence

13

people affected

4h 8m

age

4h 16m

sla

60%

progress

Currently held by

Consolidation Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Kofi Ellery

Requester of record

At station

Model impact

Workflow layer · station 3 of 5

Where this train is on the line

FI2CReallocation RequestTransactional · 5 stations

Request

16 q

Policy screen

44 q

Model impact

1 live

Approve

3 q

Apply

19 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared request

    -248m

    Budget Build Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared policy screen

    -165m

    Budget Build Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  3. Holding at model impact

    -83m

    Assumption Tracking Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Approve

run by Director, Budgeting · Policy layer

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the budget line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

approver Director, Budgeting

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.

clock 4h 8m against a commitment of 4h 16m · 97% of the time used
materiality low · blast radius 13 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading