LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Pull request at auto-approve trivial

Engineering · Code Review & Quality · line EN4A · Pull Request Review. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
EN4A-1017
Subject
Aaron Lindqvist
Requested by
Idris Sandoval
Value
$42k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
GBS spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Engineering Quality
Orchestrator
Code Quality Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Code Quality OrchestratororchestratorCleared

Cleared static analysis

2026-08-18 07:41:00ZAuthority EN4-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in b1258098...c22041out df4d402e...914d7bartifact ART-EN4A-1002-1 genesis a10b2a31...04fa44
2
Static Analysis AgenttaskCleared

Cleared generate review comments

2026-08-18 08:01:00ZAuthority EN4-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in b0eff5f0...f7a2c0out 6a0eb64a...976bc2artifact ART-EN4A-1002-2 a10b2a31...04fa44 291e031e...35a4a4
3
Complexity MonitorobserveCleared

Cleared score risk

2026-08-18 08:20:00ZAuthority EN4-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 61d3b5d8...106098out 968ef66a...59679aartifact ART-EN4A-1002-3 291e031e...35a4a4 92dfd254...7f6a82
4
Complexity MonitorobserveIn progress

Holding at auto-approve trivial

2026-08-18 08:40:00ZAuthority EN4-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 91d50270...230fa8out f8be6494...4f1af8artifact ART-EN4A-1002-4 92dfd254...7f6a82 24b7e0d6...42e6cd

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

EN4-AUTH-A1ActiveCode Quality Orchestrator

Any unit on a code review & quality line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Engineering QualityExpires 2026-10-30

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Human review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the pull request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Engineering Quality · not reached
Merge
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the pull request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Engineering Quality · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.