Pull request at auto-approve trivial
Aaron Lindqvist
Engineering · Code Review & Quality · EN4A Pull Request Review
$42k
value
67%
confidence
6
people affected
1h 19m
age
2h 43m
sla
67%
progress
Currently held by
GBS spine
Running in the shared AI GBS spine
Raised by
Idris Sandoval
Requester of record
At station
Auto-approve trivial
AI GBS layer · station 4 of 6
Where this train is on the line
Evidence trail
Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind
This is the readable trail. more
Cleared static analysis
-79mCode Quality Orchestrator
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared generate review comments
-59mStatic Analysis Agent
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
Cleared score risk
-40mComplexity Monitor
Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log
Holding at auto-approve trivial
-20mComplexity Monitor
Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached
What happens next
The next station and its rule
Human review
run by Director, Engineering Quality · Policy layer
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the pull request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
approver Director, Engineering Quality
Why the signal is what it is
Derived from time against commitment, not from the state
Green. This item is still inside the time it was committed to, and it is not close enough to that line for its materiality to pull it forward. Green says nothing about who holds it: an item can be green and sitting with a person.