Govern · agent risk record · Human Resources

Scheduling Agent

depth-agent

All agents

Risk class

Limited risk

EU AI Act Article 50

Status

Operating

Oversight

Coordinator on the requisition

Recruiting coordinator

Explanation

Published

Candidate notice states that scheduling is automated

Appeal path

Open channel

48h service level

Conformity

Self-assessed

assessed 74d ago

Classification

Why this agent sits in this class, under which regime

Regime

EU AI Act Article 50

Class

Limited risk — Transparency obligation applies. The affected person must be told they are dealing with an automated system.

Basis

Allocation of interview slots. Not an Annex III evaluation, but it interacts directly with candidates and so carries a transparency duty.

People affecting

Yes — the output changes an outcome for a named person

Scope

human-resources · human-resources/talent-acquisition

Registered

not on the register

Log retention

36 months of decision logs retained

Conformity

Self-assessed — Assessed by the operator. Not independent.

Human oversight

The measure, and the person it is attached to

Measure

Exception review. Candidates waiting more than ten working days escalate automatically.

Named human

Coordinator on the requisition · Recruiting coordinator

Autonomy

Transparency notice

Served — the affected person is told an automated system is involved

Explanation surface

Published — A standing explanation is available to the affected person without asking.

Explanation reference

Candidate notice states that scheduling is automated

How an affected person contests this

The route, the named human at the end of it, and the service level

0 appeals on record

Route

Recruiting coordinator, via the candidate portal

Path type

Open channel

The channel exists but does not resolve to a named individual.

Service level

48 hours

No appeal currently open against this agent.

No appeal has been raised against this agent. That is an absence of appeals, not evidence that the path works.

Adverse-impact readings behind this agent

Interview slot allocation · Aug 2026

Full monitoring record

Monitoring status

Monitored

Population a month

2,140

Review cadence

Quarterly

Priya Raman

Last reviewed

74d ago

Cohort	Compared with	n	Selection rate	Reference rate	Impact ratio	Reading
Women Gender	Men	942	95.3%	97.2%	0.98	Within threshold Women is selected at 98 percent of the rate for Men.
EMEA region	Americas	728	86.9%	92.4%	0.94	Within threshold EMEA is selected at 94 percent of the rate for Americas.
Asia Pacific region	Americas	621	77.5%	93.3%	0.83	Within threshold Asia Pacific is selected at 83 percent of the rate for Americas.

Open alarms on this decision point

Derived from the readings, never authored by hand

FAIR-0005Never reportableLow severityMonitoring

No reading has ever been produced for Non-binary and self-described on this decision. The cohort is declared in scope and the population exists, but it has never once been large enough to report against Men at the confidence this program requires.

Owner Nadia Kovac · opened 170d ago

FAIR-0006Sustained driftMedium severityAcknowledged

The ratio for Asia Pacific has moved from 0.88 to 0.83 across 6 periods without ever breaching. This is inside tolerance and heading out of it, which is the reading a threshold alone would miss.

Owner Nadia Kovac · opened 170d ago

What this record is, and what it is not

Read this before quoting anything above

Fairness readings computed on modeled data demonstrate the instrument, not a real audit result. The classification, the oversight measure, the explanation surface and the appeal route are design decisions recorded here so they can be argued with; the population behind the readings is modeled.

No agent on this register carries an independent third-party conformity assessment. Every assessment on file was made by the operator.

Appeal outcomes are recorded against the evidence spine where a unit reference exists. Where the evidence column reads “not recorded”, the appeal was resolved outside the spine and that is a gap, not a rounding.