Govern · agent risk record · Human Resources
Scheduling Agent
depth-agent
Risk class
Limited risk
EU AI Act Article 50
Status
Operating
A3
Oversight
Coordinator on the requisition
Recruiting coordinator
Explanation
Published
Candidate notice states that scheduling is automated
Appeal path
Open channel
48h service level
Conformity
Self-assessed
assessed 74d ago
Classification
Why this agent sits in this class, under which regime
Regime
EU AI Act Article 50
Class
Limited risk — Transparency obligation applies. The affected person must be told they are dealing with an automated system.
Basis
Allocation of interview slots. Not an Annex III evaluation, but it interacts directly with candidates and so carries a transparency duty.
People affecting
Yes — the output changes an outcome for a named person
Scope
human-resources · human-resources/talent-acquisition
Registered
not on the register
Log retention
36 months of decision logs retained
Conformity
Self-assessed — Assessed by the operator. Not independent.
Human oversight
The measure, and the person it is attached to
Measure
Exception review. Candidates waiting more than ten working days escalate automatically.
Named human
Coordinator on the requisition · Recruiting coordinator
Autonomy
A3
Transparency notice
Served — the affected person is told an automated system is involved
Explanation surface
Published — A standing explanation is available to the affected person without asking.
Explanation reference
Candidate notice states that scheduling is automated
How an affected person contests this
The route, the named human at the end of it, and the service level
0 appeals on record
Route
Recruiting coordinator, via the candidate portal
Path type
Open channel
The channel exists but does not resolve to a named individual.
Service level
48 hours
No appeal currently open against this agent.
No appeal has been raised against this agent. more
Adverse-impact readings behind this agent
Interview slot allocation · Aug 2026
Monitoring status
Monitored
Population a month
2,140
Review cadence
Quarterly
Priya Raman
Last reviewed
74d ago
| Cohort | Compared with | n | Selection rate | Reference rate | Impact ratio | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women Gender | Men | 942 | 95.3% | 97.2% | 0.98 | Within threshold Women is selected at 98 percent of the rate for Men. |
EMEA region | Americas | 728 | 86.9% | 92.4% | 0.94 | Within threshold EMEA is selected at 94 percent of the rate for Americas. |
Asia Pacific region | Americas | 621 | 77.5% | 93.3% | 0.83 | Within threshold Asia Pacific is selected at 83 percent of the rate for Americas. |
Open alarms on this decision point
Derived from the readings, never authored by hand
FAIR-0005Never reportableLow severityMonitoring
No reading has ever been produced for Non-binary and self-described on this decision. more
Owner Nadia Kovac · opened 170d ago
FAIR-0006Sustained driftMedium severityAcknowledged
The ratio for Asia Pacific has moved from 0.88 to 0.83 across 6 periods without ever breaching. more
Owner Nadia Kovac · opened 170d ago
What this record is, and what it is not
Read this before quoting anything above
Fairness readings computed on modeled data demonstrate the instrument, not a real audit result. more
No agent on this register carries an independent third-party conformity assessment. Every assessment on file was made by the operator.
Appeal outcomes are recorded against the evidence spine where a unit reference exists. more