LensReading which lens this session carries.

Govern · agent risk record · Human Resources

Pay Equity Monitor

depth-agent

All agents
Risk class
Minimal risk
EU AI Act, outside Annex III
Status
Operating
A2
Oversight
Marcus Weill
Reward partner
Explanation
Internal only
No reference document
Appeal path
Not applicable
No service level set
Conformity
Self-assessed
assessed 12d ago

Classification

Why this agent sits in this class, under which regime

Regime
EU AI Act, outside Annex III
Class
Minimal risk — No specific obligation beyond ordinary governance.
Basis
A monitoring instrument. It holds recommendations for human review; it does not set pay.
People affecting
No — the output affects work items, not people
Scope
human-resources · human-resources/total-rewards
Registered
not on the register
Log retention
84 months of decision logs retained
Conformity
Self-assessed — Assessed by the operator. Not independent.

Human oversight

The measure, and the person it is attached to

Measure
Holds are released by the reward partner. The monitor cannot approve anything.
Named human
Marcus Weill · Reward partner
Autonomy
A2
Transparency notice
Not served
Explanation surface
Internal only — Reasoning is recorded but not surfaced to the affected person.

How an affected person contests this

The route, the named human at the end of it, and the service level

0 appeals on record
Route
Not applicable.
Path type
Not applicable
This agent does not decide anything about a person, so there is nothing to contest.
Service level
—
No appeal currently open against this agent.
No appeal has been raised against this agent. That is an absence of appeals, not evidence that the path works.

What this record is, and what it is not

Read this before quoting anything above

Fairness readings computed on modeled data demonstrate the instrument, not a real audit result. The classification, the oversight measure, the explanation surface and the appeal route are design decisions recorded here so they can be argued with; the population behind the readings is modeled.

No agent on this register carries an independent third-party conformity assessment. Every assessment on file was made by the operator.

Appeal outcomes are recorded against the evidence spine where a unit reference exists. Where the evidence column reads “not recorded”, the appeal was resolved outside the spine and that is a gap, not a rounding.