Govern · agent risk record · Human Resources
Merit Cycle Agent
depth-agent
Risk class
High risk
EU AI Act Annex III(4)(b)
Status
Operating
A2
Oversight
Marcus Weill, VP Total Rewards
Reward partner
Explanation
Published
Reward statement issued to every employee at cycle close
Appeal path
Named human
240h service level
Conformity
Self-assessed
assessed 12d ago
Classification
Why this agent sits in this class, under which regime
Regime
EU AI Act Annex III(4)(b)
Class
High risk — Affects access to employment, credit or a comparable material interest. Requires human oversight, logging and contestability.
Basis
Employment: a system used in decisions affecting terms of the work relationship, specifically pay.
People affecting
Yes — the output changes an outcome for a named person
Scope
human-resources · human-resources/total-rewards
Registered
268d ago
Log retention
84 months of decision logs retained
Conformity
Self-assessed — Assessed by the operator. Not independent.
Human oversight
The measure, and the person it is attached to
Measure
Manager approval on every recommendation, followed by an automated pay-equity check that holds any increase widening a flagged gap.
Named human
Marcus Weill, VP Total Rewards · Reward partner
Autonomy
A2
Transparency notice
Served — the affected person is told an automated system is involved
Explanation surface
Published — A standing explanation is available to the affected person without asking.
Explanation reference
Reward statement issued to every employee at cycle close
How an affected person contests this
The route, the named human at the end of it, and the service level
2 appeals on record
Route
Marcus Weill, VP Total Rewards
Path type
Named human
The appeal lands with a person, not a queue.
Service level
240 hours
1 appeal past that service level right now.
| Reference | Subject | Grounds | Routed to | Age | Review | Outcome | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APL-0010 Past service level | EMP-10771 employee · UK · HR case management | Employee asks for the pay-equity check result that applied to their recommendation. | Marcus Weill VP Total Rewards | 264h of 240h | — human time | Pending | HR8A-1046 #1 |
APL-0004 Closed | EMP-09931 employee · AU · HR case management | Employee questions the market benchmark used to set the band position. | Marcus Weill VP Total Rewards | 205h of 240h | 64m human time | Original upheld Benchmark verified as the correct market cut for the role and location. more | HR3A-1025 #1 |
Adverse-impact readings behind this agent
Merit and pay recommendation · Aug 2026
Monitoring status
Monitored
Population a month
5,210
Review cadence
Per cycle, annual, with a mid-cycle equity read
Marcus Weill with Nadia Kovac
Last reviewed
12d ago
| Cohort | Compared with | n | Selection rate | Reference rate | Impact ratio | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minority ethnic groups, aggregated Ethnicity | Majority group (per local reporting standard) | 1,615 | 60.1% | 62.0% | 0.97 | Within threshold Minority ethnic groups, aggregated is selected at 97 percent of the rate for Majority group (per local reporting standard). |
Women Gender | Men | 2,292 | 58.7% | 59.9% | 0.98 | Within threshold Women is selected at 98 percent of the rate for Men. |
Under 2 years tenure-band | 2 to 5 years | 1,771 | 55.3% | 58.8% | 0.94 | Within threshold Under 2 years is selected at 94 percent of the rate for 2 to 5 years. |
Over 10 years tenure-band | 2 to 5 years | 886 | 63.0% | 63.0% | 1.00 | Within threshold Over 10 years is selected at 100 percent of the rate for 2 to 5 years. |
Open alarms on this decision point
Derived from the readings, never authored by hand
FAIR-0012Never reportableLow severityMonitoring
No reading has ever been produced for Non-binary and self-described on this decision. more
Owner Nadia Kovac · opened 170d ago
What this record is, and what it is not
Read this before quoting anything above
Fairness readings computed on modeled data demonstrate the instrument, not a real audit result. more
No agent on this register carries an independent third-party conformity assessment. Every assessment on file was made by the operator.
Appeal outcomes are recorded against the evidence spine where a unit reference exists. more