LensReading which lens this session carries.

Govern · agent risk record · Human Resources

Deprovisioning Coordination Agent

depth-agent

All agents
Risk class
Limited risk
EU AI Act Article 50
Status
Operating with a gap
A2
Oversight
Exit coordinator, Hire-to-Retire tower
Exit coordinator
Explanation
Internal only
No reference document
Appeal path
Named human
24h service level
Conformity
Not assessed
assessed 34d ago
Declared gap

No fairness monitoring has ever been switched on for this decision point, and one appeal has already been upheld against it.

Classification

Why this agent sits in this class, under which regime

Regime
EU AI Act Article 50
Class
Limited risk — Transparency obligation applies. The affected person must be told they are dealing with an automated system.
Basis
Executes a decision already made by a human. Included because a premature revocation affects a person materially.
People affecting
Yes — the output changes an outcome for a named person
Scope
human-resources · human-resources/exit-management
Registered
not on the register
Log retention
36 months of decision logs retained
Conformity
Not assessed — No conformity assessment on record.

Human oversight

The measure, and the person it is attached to

Measure
Reversible for 30 days. Every early revocation raises an incident automatically.
Named human
Exit coordinator, Hire-to-Retire tower · Exit coordinator
Autonomy
A2
Transparency notice
Not served
Explanation surface
Internal only — Reasoning is recorded but not surfaced to the affected person.

How an affected person contests this

The route, the named human at the end of it, and the service level

1 appeal on record
Route
Yusuf Adeyemi, Chief Technology Officer
Path type
Named human
The appeal lands with a person, not a queue.
Service level
24 hours
No appeal currently open against this agent.
ReferenceSubjectGroundsRouted toAgeReviewOutcomeEvidence
APL-0013
Closed
EMP-07740
employee · DE · IT service desk
Access was revoked four days before the agreed leaving date, blocking handover.
Yusuf Adeyemi
Chief Technology Officer
6h
of 24h
15m
human time
Overturned
Termination date in the HR system had not been updated after an extension. Access restored within six hours and an incident was raised against the date synchronization.
IT1A-1020 #1

Adverse-impact readings behind this agent

Access revocation on exit · no period computed

Full monitoring record
Monitoring status
Not monitored
Population a month
520
Review cadence
Quarterly
Yusuf Adeyemi
Last reviewed
34d ago
No fairness reading exists for this decision point. An absent reading is shown as absent, never as a pass.

Open alarms on this decision point

Derived from the readings, never authored by hand

FAIR-0023Monitoring absentHigh severityOpen
No adverse-impact monitoring has ever run on this decision, in any cohort. It affects people materially and an appeal against it has already been recorded, so the absence of a reading is itself the finding.
Owner Yusuf Adeyemi · opened 170d ago

What this record is, and what it is not

Read this before quoting anything above

Fairness readings computed on modeled data demonstrate the instrument, not a real audit result. The classification, the oversight measure, the explanation surface and the appeal route are design decisions recorded here so they can be argued with; the population behind the readings is modeled.

No agent on this register carries an independent third-party conformity assessment. Every assessment on file was made by the operator.

Appeal outcomes are recorded against the evidence spine where a unit reference exists. Where the evidence column reads “not recorded”, the appeal was resolved outside the spine and that is a gap, not a rounding.