LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Submission at publish

Revenue Operations · Forecast Integrity · line RO9C · Accuracy Scorecard. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
1
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
RO9C-1001
Subject
Maeve Ferreira
Requested by
Yuki Ito
Value
$508k
Materiality
high
Currently held by
P2P spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
VP Revenue Operations
Orchestrator
Forecast Integrity Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Submission Compliance AgenttaskCleared

Cleared aggregate history

2026-08-18 02:32:00ZAuthority RO9-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in a56b7111...d14263out f184cc0d...401eadartifact ART-RO9C-1000-1 genesis 5e594b49...ef3148
2
Model vs Commit AgenttaskCleared

Cleared rank

2026-08-18 04:41:00ZAuthority RO9-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 853e0394...d94e4dout 3d6ebca8...f78a80artifact ART-RO9C-1000-2 5e594b49...ef3148 e5cc1494...0ba283
3
Forecast Integrity OrchestratororchestratorRefused

Attempted clearance above the delegated cap

2026-08-18 06:48:00ZAuthority RO9-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in 7a06b3ae...9006c1out 845bfffc...196b69artifact ART-RO9C-3-refusal e5cc1494...0ba283 bdd71da4...7b5cc8
4
Model vs Commit AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at publish

2026-08-18 06:51:00ZAuthority RO9-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 81f9745d...168eceout bab39c0b...c1cb7bartifact ART-RO9C-1000-4 bdd71da4...7b5cc8 a6a70eee...c0ca88

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

RO9-AUTH-A1ActiveForecast Integrity Orchestrator

Any unit on a forecast integrity line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DEDelegated from VP Revenue OperationsExpires 2026-11-20

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policycustomer-commitmentsv5currentChief revenue officer
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

CUST-5Y5 years
Customer commitment and service evidence
Consumer claim windows and revenue recognition audit trail.
Deleted at five years from the last account activity.
AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.