LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Collaboration at publish

Research & Development · External Collaboration · line RD9C · Publication Clearance. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
2
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
RD9C-1037
Subject
Leila Raman
Requested by
Leila Lindqvist
Value
$85k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Partner Strategy Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, External Innovation
Orchestrator
Collaboration Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Agreement Coordination AgenttaskCleared

Cleared ip screen

2026-08-18 07:05:00ZAuthority RD9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in c755fa3a...4320adout 0a486059...3376c0artifact ART-RD9C-1005-1 genesis 4efe7d89...90dc4d
2
Milestone Tracking AgenttaskCleared

Cleared competitive screen

2026-08-18 07:28:00ZAuthority RD9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 0a3e7dda...71fe50out aa22968f...3ecddfartifact ART-RD9C-1005-2 4efe7d89...90dc4d 1ceb9081...19b87e
3
Director, External Innovationaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared counsel review

2026-08-18 07:51:00ZAuthority RD9-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention TECH-3Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in bb4b5c18...ef6718out 13194801...be4777artifact ART-RD9C-1005-3 1ceb9081...19b87e 84326f91...8ae16e
4
Director, External Innovationaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared approve

2026-08-18 08:14:00ZAuthority RD9-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention TECH-3Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in 49f44715...ec6c86out 8baa31a9...17a1a1artifact ART-RD9C-1005-4 84326f91...8ae16e 835aaf53...fef44c
5
Partner Strategy AgentstrategyIn progress

Holding at publish

2026-08-18 08:37:00ZAuthority RD9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
challenger-review@p6
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 1f282ac7...89aca8out a91bb8c6...b91dc8artifact ART-RD9C-1005-5 835aaf53...fef44c ab41fe9f...13c482

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

RD9-AUTH-A1ActiveCollaboration Orchestrator

Any unit on a external collaboration line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, External InnovationExpires 2026-10-20
RD9-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, External Innovation

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Research & Development leadershipExpires 2027-04-04

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptchallenger-reviewp6currentStrategy office
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Counsel review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the collaboration decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, External Innovation · not reached
Approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the collaboration decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, External Innovation · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.