LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Lab request at prepare

Research & Development · Lab Operations · line RD4A · Instrument Booking. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
RD4A-1013
Subject
Grace Costa
Requested by
Priya Tanaka
Value
$15k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
C2L spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Laboratory Operations
Orchestrator
Lab Operations Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Scheduling AgentgbsCleared

Cleared request

2026-08-18 02:59:00ZAuthority RD4-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in d5d21988...c001e7out c1b9a200...8bf74fartifact ART-RD4A-1001-1 genesis 3442054f...ce901f
2
Scheduling AgentgbsCleared

Cleared check availability

2026-08-18 04:29:00ZAuthority RD4-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in aa1fdbea...375f7bout eb8a7c19...c30681artifact ART-RD4A-1001-2 3442054f...ce901f 7485e5d8...50f6a4
3
Scheduling AgentgbsCleared

Cleared book

2026-08-18 05:59:00ZAuthority RD4-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in ec773f14...224000out bb232ca4...b83b2fartifact ART-RD4A-1001-3 7485e5d8...50f6a4 71637a60...dead84
4
Scheduling AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at prepare

2026-08-18 07:30:00ZAuthority RD4-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 8fbb0026...62bdcbout 5e94a2a0...65384dartifact ART-RD4A-1001-4 71637a60...dead84 ceccd803...ef7fc9

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

RD4-AUTH-A1ActiveLab Operations Orchestrator

Any unit on a lab operations line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Director, Laboratory OperationsExpires 2027-05-29

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.