LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Protocol at ethics clearance

Research & Development · Experiment Design · line RD3A · Protocol Development. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
2
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
RD3A-1021
Subject
Callum Muller
Requested by
Oscar Tanaka
Value
$26k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Director, Research Methods (human)
Sub-function owner
Director, Research Methods
Orchestrator
Experiment Design Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Power Analysis AgenttaskCleared

Cleared draft protocol

2026-08-18 07:49:00ZAuthority RD3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in b20838b7...40cc18out 445a71c1...d3a10dartifact ART-RD3A-1003-1 genesis e56dcfde...1a74ad
2
Control Design AgenttaskCleared

Cleared power analysis

2026-08-18 08:03:00ZAuthority RD3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 3117c2e7...297288out 218c2289...7bfd9fartifact ART-RD3A-1003-2 e56dcfde...1a74ad 0c7ca6f8...e72b7f
3
Bias Detection AgentobserveCleared

Cleared bias review

2026-08-18 08:17:00ZAuthority RD3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 4179b67c...ec1702out d388df85...4d6d3fartifact ART-RD3A-1003-3 0c7ca6f8...e72b7f b3e3a797...048b67
4
Director, Research Methodsgate-approverCleared

Cleared scientist review

2026-08-18 08:32:00ZAuthority RD3-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention TECH-3Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in 6c16c017...cac90eout c6d5e422...bc7493artifact ART-RD3A-1003-4 b3e3a797...048b67 f7cd70e8...406a56
5
Director, Research Methodsgate-approverHeld

Holding at ethics clearance

2026-08-18 08:46:00ZAuthority RD3-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention TECH-3Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in b90253f4...5cd83dout 02183200...610d18artifact ART-RD3A-1003-5 f7cd70e8...406a56 92cf056c...31c651

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

RD3-AUTH-A1ActiveExperiment Design Orchestrator

Any unit on a experiment design line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Director, Research MethodsExpires 2027-05-20
RD3-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Research Methods

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Research & Development leadershipExpires 2027-02-24

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Scientist review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the protocol decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Research Methods · not reached
Ethics clearance
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the protocol decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Research Methods · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.