LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Program at draft recommendation

Research & Development · Innovation Portfolio · line RD2A · Stage Gate Review. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
RD2A-1004
Subject
Ethan Farouk
Requested by
Priya Petrov
Value
$88k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Idea Intake Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Innovation
Orchestrator
Innovation Portfolio Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Innovation Portfolio OrchestratororchestratorCleared

Cleared assemble evidence

2026-08-18 05:48:00ZAuthority RD2-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in 69f8a040...ba2402out 6586e888...9e28a7artifact ART-RD2A-1000-1 genesis f95273c3...e6c43f
2
Stage Gate AgenttaskCleared

Cleared score against criteria

2026-08-18 06:52:00ZAuthority RD2-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in bf5d93b2...40acdfout 76ac35ff...020eacartifact ART-RD2A-1000-2 f95273c3...e6c43f 7b3d0f8c...3cf7f6
3
Portfolio Balance AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at draft recommendation

2026-08-18 07:56:00ZAuthority RD2-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 12aba0b2...a5f9e7out 64264767...c9d4ddartifact ART-RD2A-1000-3 7b3d0f8c...3cf7f6 88b5589e...4e340c

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

RD2-AUTH-A1ActiveInnovation Portfolio Orchestrator

Any unit on a innovation portfolio line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from VP InnovationExpires 2026-12-26

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Gate committee decide
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the program decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Innovation · not reached
Fund or stop
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the program decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Innovation · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.