LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

PRC-9041

This pack names every action recorded against this reference.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 1 record were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
1
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
0
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Avery ChenEnterprise Chief of StaffCleared

Approved and released: RFx comparison pack — logistics tender.

2026-08-18 23:07:57ZAuthority PR1-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
none
in eaf04c87...66b7b4out c336cc72...b79733artifact decision://PRC-9041 genesis → d6ccc948...0de4e7

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR1-AUTH-H1ActiveVP Category Management

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Procurement & Source-to-Pay leadershipExpires 2027-02-09

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.