LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Requisition at approve above threshold

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Requisition & PO · line PR8C · Change Order.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
PR8C-1037
Subject
Lukas Muller
Requested by
Nadia Duarte
Value
$31k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Director, Procurement Operations (human)
Sub-function owner
Director, Procurement Operations
Orchestrator
Requisition Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Guided Buying AgentgbsCleared

Cleared detect variance

2026-08-18 06:52:00ZAuthority PR8-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 15ceec0c...794e80out 6ddab9b4...de5d2fartifact ART-PR8C-1005-1 genesis → ff1c6db6...aa6a58
2
Catalog Match AgenttaskCleared

Cleared model impact

2026-08-18 07:35:00ZAuthority PR8-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 26654aa8...902f62out 463882b7...3dc535artifact ART-PR8C-1005-2 ff1c6db6...aa6a58 → 9825e021...aa18b0
3
Director, Procurement Operationsgate-approverHeld

Holding at approve above threshold

2026-08-18 08:17:00ZAuthority PR8-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
none
in 9cfd7ef8...4af137out 3ad590a0...c12f85artifact ART-PR8C-1005-3 9825e021...aa18b0 → a84c9336...3d72ae

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR8-AUTH-A1ActiveRequisition Orchestrator

Any unit on a requisition & po line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Director, Procurement OperationsExpires 2026-10-05
PR8-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Procurement Operations

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome.

Cap $25,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Procurement & Source-to-Pay leadershipExpires 2026-10-01

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysupplier-onboardingv6currentChief procurement officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Approve above threshold
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the requisition decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Procurement Operations · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.