LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Requisition at sourcing check

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Requisition & PO · line PR8B · Non-catalog Request.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
PR8B-1018
Subject
Priya Farouk
Requested by
Idris Ferreira
Value
$45k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Change Order Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Procurement Operations
Orchestrator
Requisition Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Guided Buying AgentgbsCleared

Cleared request

2026-08-18 08:51:00ZAuthority PR8-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 4aa666dd...26f91fout 3031738c...e252c0artifact ART-PR8B-1002-1 genesis → 0b5e5d1d...52dc21
2
Catalog Match AgenttaskCleared

Cleared classify

2026-08-18 08:54:00ZAuthority PR8-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in eb6f4720...2d9ec9out 126cc253...c870c2artifact ART-PR8B-1002-2 0b5e5d1d...52dc21 → 8f857d19...fb55c8
3
Budget Check AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at sourcing check

2026-08-18 08:57:00ZAuthority PR8-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in a8521670...d92092out 0d607770...e5bea5artifact ART-PR8B-1002-3 8f857d19...fb55c8 → 91afbe17...ab9d15

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR8-AUTH-A1ActiveRequisition Orchestrator

Any unit on a requisition & po line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Director, Procurement OperationsExpires 2026-10-05

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysupplier-onboardingv6currentChief procurement officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the requisition decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Procurement Operations · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.