LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Supplier contract at model delta

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Contract Execution · line PR5B · Contract Amendment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 2 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
2
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
PR5B-1047
Subject
Maeve Costa
Requested by
Pierre Duarte
Value
$48k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Obligation Load Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Contract Management
Orchestrator
Procurement Contract Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Template Selection AgentgbsCleared

Cleared request

2026-08-18 08:59:00ZAuthority PR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A3Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 5a4d6516...9eee3dout e5441a1e...e4debcartifact ART-PR5B-1006-1 genesis → a7ff32bd...d3fe76
2
Terms Assembly AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at model delta

2026-08-18 08:59:00ZAuthority PR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A3Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 06be3ca9...2b050eout f0099742...66d058artifact ART-PR5B-1006-2 a7ff32bd...d3fe76 → ea6ceafe...af3005

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR5-AUTH-A1ActiveProcurement Contract Orchestrator

Any unit on a contract execution line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Director, Contract ManagementExpires 2026-09-11

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysupplier-onboardingv6currentChief procurement officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Legal check
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the supplier contract decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Contract Management · not reached
Approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the supplier contract decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Contract Management · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.