LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Supplier contract at execute

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Contract Execution · line PR5A · Supplier Agreement. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
2
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
PR5A-1012
Subject
Hannah Haddad
Requested by
Wren Ferreira
Value
$57k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
S2P spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Contract Management
Orchestrator
Procurement Contract Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Director, Contract Managementaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared legal review

2026-08-18 07:19:00ZAuthority PR5-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
none
in 334abe7e...51acfeout 1f6a5103...793103artifact ART-PR5A-1001-1 genesis c424978d...055ae7
2
Signature AgentgbsCleared

Cleared supplier redline

2026-08-18 07:39:00ZAuthority PR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in ce9cce5a...67ebdfout 2ae6e8f4...cc7ba2artifact ART-PR5A-1001-2 c424978d...055ae7 9cc7dec3...e983b2
3
Template Selection AgentgbsCleared

Cleared auto-accept in-policy

2026-08-18 07:59:00ZAuthority PR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in d9e25096...b6a230out a3706734...fcb036artifact ART-PR5A-1001-3 9cc7dec3...e983b2 6ee724ee...2adf2a
4
Director, Contract Managementaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared approve

2026-08-18 08:20:00ZAuthority PR5-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
none
in a874aa7d...b3d953out 9c1ce63d...020017artifact ART-PR5A-1001-4 6ee724ee...2adf2a cf2d3afb...ec54b2
5
Template Selection AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at execute

2026-08-18 08:40:00ZAuthority PR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 044a2754...b62df0out 87c2ff98...a78131artifact ART-PR5A-1001-5 cf2d3afb...ec54b2 697aee57...814abe

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR5-AUTH-A1ActiveProcurement Contract Orchestrator

Any unit on a contract execution line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Director, Contract ManagementExpires 2026-09-11
PR5-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Contract Management

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Procurement & Source-to-Pay leadershipExpires 2027-02-07

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysupplier-onboardingv6currentChief procurement officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Legal review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the supplier contract decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Contract Management · not reached
Approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the supplier contract decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Contract Management · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds. The sanctions and beneficial ownership evidence is the material part of the record.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.