LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Negotiation at draft doctrine

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Negotiation & Award · line PR4C · Negotiation Doctrine Refresh.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
PR4C-1010
Subject
Leila Farouk
Requested by
Ethan Mensah
Value
$4.5m
Materiality
high
Currently held by
Term Comparison Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Sourcing
Orchestrator
Negotiation Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Negotiation Prep AgenttaskCleared

Cleared frame

2026-08-16 05:04:00ZAuthority PR4-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in d74529e3...62e117out 1ebc112a...586b41artifact ART-PR4C-1001-1 genesis → b9117378...74a32e
2
Concession Modeling AgenttaskCleared

Cleared mine outcomes

2026-08-16 22:23:00ZAuthority PR4-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in bbc067a4...985aacout ce72e1df...038dc8artifact ART-PR4C-1001-2 b9117378...74a32e → 1e341aa1...bc1ee3
3
Counterparty Position AgentstrategyIn progress

Holding at draft doctrine

2026-08-17 15:41:00ZAuthority PR4-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
challenger-review@p6
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 067a7647...624a14out 247c618f...067eaeartifact ART-PR4C-1001-3 1e341aa1...bc1ee3 → 3c9b393a...2fb520

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR4-AUTH-A1ActiveNegotiation Orchestrator

Any unit on a negotiation & award line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from VP SourcingExpires 2026-11-11

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysupplier-onboardingv6currentChief procurement officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptchallenger-reviewp6currentStrategy office
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the negotiation decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Sourcing · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.