LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Negotiation at model impact

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Negotiation & Award · line PR4B · Concession Approval. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 2 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
2
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
PR4B-1009
Subject
Callum Brennan
Requested by
Victor Raman
Value
$87k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Award Documentation Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Sourcing
Orchestrator
Negotiation Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Negotiation Prep AgenttaskCleared

Cleared request

2026-08-18 05:23:00ZAuthority PR4-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A2Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in ee7d6afb...b1beb5out ef01e8db...f840d1artifact ART-PR4B-1001-1 genesis d3c369d2...c2ff11
2
Concession Modeling AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at model impact

2026-08-18 07:11:00ZAuthority PR4-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A2Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 28bb80f7...43290bout 7bde1b59...c20681artifact ART-PR4B-1001-2 d3c369d2...c2ff11 e7823d7f...98cdf2

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR4-AUTH-A1ActiveNegotiation Orchestrator

Any unit on a negotiation & award line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from VP SourcingExpires 2026-11-11

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysupplier-onboardingv6currentChief procurement officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the negotiation decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Sourcing · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds. The sanctions and beneficial ownership evidence is the material part of the record.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.