LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Negotiation at approve

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Negotiation & Award · line PR4B · Concession Approval.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
PR4B-1006
Subject
Rosa Whitfield
Requested by
Amara Duarte
Value
$30k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
VP Sourcing (human)
Sub-function owner
VP Sourcing
Orchestrator
Negotiation Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Negotiation Prep AgenttaskCleared

Cleared request

2026-08-17 19:32:00ZAuthority PR4-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A2Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 77f9c7b9...067b12out 9eebc1ce...1f6ed7artifact ART-PR4B-1000-1 genesis → 2c4b3a69...38606b
2
Concession Modeling AgenttaskCleared

Cleared model impact

2026-08-17 22:54:00ZAuthority PR4-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A2Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 6095a486...fa092fout dfe6cf84...76b2fcartifact ART-PR4B-1000-2 2c4b3a69...38606b → be90c387...f883a0
3
Concession Modeling AgenttaskCleared

Cleared policy screen

2026-08-18 02:16:00ZAuthority PR4-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A2Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in b6d5ff18...7cfe11out de4ea72d...07956eartifact ART-PR4B-1000-3 be90c387...f883a0 → ee42a5c8...cb8d8c
4
VP Sourcinggate-approverHeld

Holding at approve

2026-08-18 05:38:00ZAuthority PR4-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
none
in 52d3b613...635f5dout bd116590...0e26e5artifact ART-PR4B-1000-4 ee42a5c8...cb8d8c → 4032ae6a...2cb5a4

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR4-AUTH-A1ActiveNegotiation Orchestrator

Any unit on a negotiation & award line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from VP SourcingExpires 2026-11-11
PR4-AUTH-H1ActiveVP Sourcing

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Procurement & Source-to-Pay leadershipExpires 2027-04-20

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysupplier-onboardingv6currentChief procurement officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the negotiation decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Sourcing · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.