LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Spend line at enrich supplier

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Spend Analytics · line PR2A · Continuous Spend Classification.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
PR2A-1020
Subject
Farrah Baptiste
Requested by
Callum Costa
Value
$15k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
S2P spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Procurement Analytics
Orchestrator
Spend Analytics Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Spend Classification AgentgbsCleared

Cleared ingest

2026-08-18 08:28:00ZAuthority PR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in ce950260...ae92b5out 219d7669...007273artifact ART-PR2A-1002-1 genesis → a29f9f40...98487a
2
Spend Classification AgentgbsCleared

Cleared classify

2026-08-18 08:39:00ZAuthority PR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 009f6c22...881bf9out f2af4732...fc1587artifact ART-PR2A-1002-2 a29f9f40...98487a → 6422a38e...be3b05
3
Spend Classification AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at enrich supplier

2026-08-18 08:49:00ZAuthority PR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in eac7c9b6...b4c690out e8507838...b850a0artifact ART-PR2A-1002-3 6422a38e...be3b05 → 79952ae5...86c78a

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR2-AUTH-A1ActiveSpend Analytics Orchestrator

Any unit on a spend analytics line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Director, Procurement AnalyticsExpires 2026-11-27

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysupplier-onboardingv6currentChief procurement officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Flag unclassified
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the spend line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Procurement Analytics · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.