LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Savings claim at compare contracted to paid

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Savings Assurance · line PR11B · Leakage Detection. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 1 record were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
1
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
1
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
PR11B-1034
Subject
Idris Duarte
Requested by
Priya Rhodes
Value
$57k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
S2P spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Value Assurance
Orchestrator
Savings Assurance Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Savings Claim AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at compare contracted to paid

2026-08-18 07:19:00ZAuthority PR11-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A4Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 42973fb1...d50d84out 733ffb5c...00595eartifact ART-PR11B-1004-1 genesis 5e8e54f6...b3a129

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR11-AUTH-A1ActiveSavings Assurance Orchestrator

Any unit on a savings assurance line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Director, Value AssuranceExpires 2027-03-03

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysupplier-onboardingv6currentChief procurement officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Recover
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the savings claim decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Value Assurance · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds. The sanctions and beneficial ownership evidence is the material part of the record.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.