LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Payment run at treasury review

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Payment Interlock · line PR10C · Term Optimization. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
1
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
PR10C-1004
Subject
Oscar Delgado
Requested by
Nadia Rhodes
Value
$712k
Materiality
high
Currently held by
Director, Payment Operations (human)
Sub-function owner
Director, Payment Operations
Orchestrator
Payment Interlock Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Payment Proposal AgentgbsCleared

Cleared model working capital

2026-08-17 03:52:00ZAuthority PR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in eaaede55...b270d5out dabe8c7d...a283b5artifact ART-PR10C-1000-1 genesis 2ea4a3f9...5d2da6
2
Discount Capture AgenttaskCleared

Cleared draft recommendation

2026-08-17 13:35:00ZAuthority PR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in d9a57539...0be629out 5a5f0668...3270a0artifact ART-PR10C-1000-2 2ea4a3f9...5d2da6 1f09fa36...e86316
3
Payment Interlock OrchestratororchestratorRefused

Attempted clearance above the delegated cap

2026-08-17 23:14:00ZAuthority PR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention AI-10YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in 2ae8179b...70e93cout 2ac3c573...8e47cbartifact ART-PR10C-3-refusal 1f09fa36...e86316 8fcfed9d...7594b8
4
Director, Payment Operationsgate-approverHeld

Holding at treasury review

2026-08-17 23:17:00ZAuthority PR10-AUTH-H1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A0Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
none
in 1006dede...767200out 501038e8...28e84bartifact ART-PR10C-1000-4 8fcfed9d...7594b8 0a878a2d...e67917

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR10-AUTH-A1ActivePayment Interlock Orchestrator

Any unit on a payment interlock line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Director, Payment OperationsExpires 2027-01-15
PR10-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Payment Operations

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Procurement & Source-to-Pay leadershipExpires 2026-12-18

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysupplier-onboardingv6currentChief procurement officer
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Treasury review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the payment run decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Payment Operations · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.
PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds. The sanctions and beneficial ownership evidence is the material part of the record.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.