LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Payment run at fraud screen

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Payment Interlock · line PR10B · Urgent Payment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-003

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
PR10B-1012
Subject
Wren Adeyemi
Requested by
Priya Kowalski
Value
$7k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
S2P spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Payment Operations
Orchestrator
Payment Interlock Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Payment Proposal AgentgbsCleared

Cleared request

2026-08-18 08:42:00ZAuthority PR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A3Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 7e3b2a33...598362out c72dbff4...2cf01aartifact ART-PR10B-1001-1 genesis → 638d657b...898941
2
Discount Capture AgenttaskCleared

Cleared justify

2026-08-18 08:48:00ZAuthority PR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A3Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 7dcbc623...ad69c2out fb6c0d2d...99b7b0artifact ART-PR10B-1001-2 638d657b...898941 → 5ccc97df...727177
3
Payment Proposal AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at fraud screen

2026-08-18 08:54:00ZAuthority PR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A3Retention PROC-7YLegal hold HOLD-003
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
supplier-onboarding@v6
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 8d9f3379...b4f0a7out 9914fa8e...c38ccaartifact ART-PR10B-1001-3 5ccc97df...727177 → 926b863a...6fdea2

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

PR10-AUTH-A1ActivePayment Interlock Orchestrator

Any unit on a payment interlock line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Director, Payment OperationsExpires 2027-01-15

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysupplier-onboardingv6currentChief procurement officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Dual approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the payment run decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Payment Operations · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

PROC-7Y7 years
Supplier and contract evidence
Contract limitation periods and public-sector supplier audit rights.
Deleted at seven years from contract expiry, not from record creation.
HOLD-003active
Supplier dispute — award challenge
An unsuccessful supplier has challenged an award on process grounds.
Custodian Head of Commercial Law · requested by Chief Procurement Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.