LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Advocacy asset at publish

Marketing · Customer Advocacy · line MK9A · Case Study Production. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
2
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
MK9A-1013
Subject
Talia Bianchi
Requested by
Sofia Achebe
Value
$58k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Case Study Drafting Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Customer Advocacy
Orchestrator
Advocacy Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Case Study Drafting AgenttaskCleared

Cleared interview

2026-08-18 04:50:00ZAuthority MK9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in aba47426...42befcout a666be72...57f1e4artifact ART-MK9A-1001-1 genesis 9da2c99f...d06e5e
2
Review Solicitation AgenttaskCleared

Cleared draft

2026-08-18 05:40:00ZAuthority MK9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 16fbe15c...40f335out e9ab5fbf...b77a55artifact ART-MK9A-1001-2 9da2c99f...d06e5e e8a5e2eb...b4c479
3
Director, Customer Advocacyaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared customer approve

2026-08-18 06:30:00ZAuthority MK9-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A0Retention CUST-5Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
none
in b333f0d2...7629dfout e39c7d7f...1580d4artifact ART-MK9A-1001-3 e8a5e2eb...b4c479 6d6e29c9...431214
4
Director, Customer Advocacyaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared legal clear

2026-08-18 07:20:00ZAuthority MK9-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A0Retention CUST-5Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
none
in 1eb6ef7d...00d5beout 0e171b6b...1841c6artifact ART-MK9A-1001-4 6d6e29c9...431214 566e0865...1f2199
5
Advocacy OrchestratororchestratorIn progress

Holding at publish

2026-08-18 08:10:00ZAuthority MK9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention CUST-5Y
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in c81a972a...391b4eout ddce066c...c725adartifact ART-MK9A-1001-5 566e0865...1f2199 e868a54c...63354b

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

MK9-AUTH-A1ActiveAdvocacy Orchestrator

Any unit on a customer advocacy line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Director, Customer AdvocacyExpires 2026-10-12
MK9-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Customer Advocacy

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Marketing leadershipExpires 2026-10-31

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policycustomer-commitmentsv5currentChief revenue officer
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Secure consent
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the advocacy asset decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Customer Advocacy · not reached
Customer approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the advocacy asset decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Customer Advocacy · not reached
Legal clear
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the advocacy asset decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Customer Advocacy · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

CUST-5Y5 years
Customer commitment and service evidence
Consumer claim windows and revenue recognition audit trail.
Deleted at five years from the last account activity.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.