LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Privacy case at sign

Legal · Privacy & Data Protection · line LG9B · Privacy Impact Assessment. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 6 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
6
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
3
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
1
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
LG9B-1038
Subject
Nadia Petrov
Requested by
Pierre Brennan
Value
$74k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Processing Register Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Data Protection Officer
Orchestrator
Privacy Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Processing Register AgenttaskCleared

Cleared scope

2026-08-18 05:31:00ZAuthority LG9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 1f5bbda2...a0c60cout f38ff74c...31cd49artifact ART-LG9B-1005-1 genesis fa565d94...cdedb8
2
Impact Assessment AgenttaskCleared

Cleared draft assessment

2026-08-18 06:13:00ZAuthority LG9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 94e8f730...807f3eout ee0c4332...924822artifact ART-LG9B-1005-2 fa565d94...cdedb8 8b70dcf6...ffd201
3
Data Protection Officergate-approverCleared

Cleared privacy review

2026-08-18 06:55:00ZAuthority LG9-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention LEG-10Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in a080d6d1...58cd1dout 579b509b...0454bcartifact ART-LG9B-1005-3 8b70dcf6...ffd201 ec215f7f...a9991b
4
Breach Triage AgenttaskCleared

Cleared mitigations

2026-08-18 07:36:00ZAuthority LG9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in de0f76a9...cf5269out bc6f4e8c...3d7cc1artifact ART-LG9B-1005-4 ec215f7f...a9991b d7c0223b...084426
5
Data Protection Officergate-approverIn progress

Holding at sign

2026-08-18 08:18:00ZAuthority LG9-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention LEG-10Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in 733d61b2...1809d2out fbfbbc38...e7625bartifact ART-LG9B-1005-5 d7c0223b...084426 f6c4475b...8ba3c6
6
Data Protection Officeraccountable-ownerCorrectioncorrects #3

Correction posted against record 3

An input was read from a stale reference and the earlier record states the wrong figure. The earlier record stands unaltered; this record carries the corrected figure and the reason.

2026-08-18 08:20:00ZAuthority LG9-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention LEG-10Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in 3e1da8d4...b7534eout 0772f336...3a372fartifact ART-LG9B-1005-correction f6c4475b...8ba3c6 86f0702a...ae5cb5

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

LG9-AUTH-A1ActivePrivacy Orchestrator

Any unit on a privacy & data protection line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Data Protection OfficerExpires 2026-11-09
LG9-AUTH-H1ActiveData Protection Officer

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Legal leadershipExpires 2027-05-06

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Privacy review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the privacy case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Data Protection Officer · not reached
Sign
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the privacy case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Data Protection Officer · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

LEG-10Y10 years
Legal and regulatory correspondence
Regulatory inspection windows and the outer limitation period for corporate filings.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted while any related matter carries an open hold.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.