LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Matter at gc ratify

Legal · Litigation & Disputes · line LG7C · Settlement Position. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
LG7C-1000
Subject
Yuki Ferreira
Requested by
Sanjay Tanaka
Value
$39.5m
Materiality
critical
Currently held by
Matter Intake Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Litigation
Orchestrator
Litigation Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Legal Hold AgentpolicyCleared

Cleared model outcomes

2026-08-14 04:14:00ZAuthority LG7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
gate-approval@p8
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 6a4ca61f...1c02f3out 470029e6...069919artifact ART-LG7C-1000-1 genesis 83ef4032...e147a3
2
Document Review AgenttaskCleared

Cleared cost of continuing

2026-08-15 00:23:00ZAuthority LG7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 9aef3ddb...cf88f1out a1cb63a3...b746d1artifact ART-LG7C-1000-2 83ef4032...e147a3 8adff21a...9142c8
3
Chronology Builder AgenttaskCleared

Cleared draft position

2026-08-15 20:32:00ZAuthority LG7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in e5ae99b7...4dfd02out ef61deca...73c63aartifact ART-LG7C-1000-3 8adff21a...9142c8 fa1a0be7...ef8e91
4
Exposure Modeling AgenttaskCleared

Cleared challenge

2026-08-16 16:42:00ZAuthority LG7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 2db31d68...81f993out a6aeb59d...9c5f84artifact ART-LG7C-1000-4 fa1a0be7...ef8e91 8c6c657b...c19dd6
5
VP Litigationgate-approverIn progress

Holding at gc ratify

2026-08-17 12:51:00ZAuthority LG7-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A0Retention LEG-10Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in 38771e4b...dc6348out d75a8341...db2332artifact ART-LG7C-1000-5 8c6c657b...c19dd6 b297ac3a...aa2186

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

LG7-AUTH-A1ActiveLitigation Orchestrator

Any unit on a litigation & disputes line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from VP LitigationExpires 2027-03-07
LG7-AUTH-H1ActiveVP Litigation

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Legal leadershipExpires 2027-01-31

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
promptgate-approvalp8currentGovernance office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

GC ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the matter decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Litigation · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

LEG-10Y10 years
Legal and regulatory correspondence
Regulatory inspection windows and the outer limitation period for corporate filings.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted while any related matter carries an open hold.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.