LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Matter at log

Legal · Litigation & Disputes · line LG7B · Discovery Production. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
2
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
LG7B-1006
Subject
Lukas Voss
Requested by
Anika Okafor
Value
$9k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
GBS spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
VP Litigation
Orchestrator
Litigation Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Matter Intake AgenttaskCleared

Cleared collect

2026-08-18 07:49:00ZAuthority LG7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in f0bad3ec...b788a0out 5acb5eec...e0bf90artifact ART-LG7B-1000-1 genesis 31bc6b0b...a9d48f
2
Document Review AgenttaskCleared

Cleared review

2026-08-18 08:03:00ZAuthority LG7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 17b3edf9...64dfdfout 1e6c680f...f9f7a0artifact ART-LG7B-1000-2 31bc6b0b...a9d48f 85faa769...7c7ff5
3
VP Litigationaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared privilege check

2026-08-18 08:17:00ZAuthority LG7-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A0Retention LEG-10Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in a1ce892c...0619e7out 3f2e2210...32fa0fartifact ART-LG7B-1000-3 85faa769...7c7ff5 19ae5172...3ebb09
4
VP Litigationaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared produce

2026-08-18 08:32:00ZAuthority LG7-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A0Retention LEG-10Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in c958e739...60fd8aout a20f8775...7b97beartifact ART-LG7B-1000-4 19ae5172...3ebb09 dc4585a7...d50447
5
Exposure Modeling AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at log

2026-08-18 08:46:00ZAuthority LG7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 6a85c205...d0ed7cout 842fa60e...3d285fartifact ART-LG7B-1000-5 dc4585a7...d50447 120500ae...aa8253

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

LG7-AUTH-A1ActiveLitigation Orchestrator

Any unit on a litigation & disputes line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from VP LitigationExpires 2027-03-07
LG7-AUTH-H1ActiveVP Litigation

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Legal leadershipExpires 2027-01-31

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Privilege check
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the matter decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Litigation · not reached
Produce
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the matter decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Litigation · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

LEG-10Y10 years
Legal and regulatory correspondence
Regulatory inspection windows and the outer limitation period for corporate filings.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted while any related matter carries an open hold.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.