LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

IP matter at docket

Legal · IP Portfolio · line LG6A · Invention to Filing. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
2
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
LG6A-1054
Subject
Idris Achebe
Requested by
Callum Farouk
Value
$30k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Chief IP Counsel (human)
Sub-function owner
Chief IP Counsel
Orchestrator
IP Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Filing Calendar AgenttaskCleared

Cleared patentability draft

2026-08-18 07:46:00ZAuthority LG6-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 30e40585...5a90b3out e92d2def...6b3598artifact ART-LG6A-1007-1 genesis 2f0bfd07...b70762
2
Chief IP Counselaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared committee decision

2026-08-18 08:01:00ZAuthority LG6-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A0Retention LEG-10Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in 8dac15e4...ba50f9out 92bff643...20dde9artifact ART-LG6A-1007-2 2f0bfd07...b70762 b2ec4b79...a51497
3
Chief IP Counselaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared instruct counsel

2026-08-18 08:16:00ZAuthority LG6-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A0Retention LEG-10Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in b8469b39...e65fcdout e99c9016...4cf63fartifact ART-LG6A-1007-3 b2ec4b79...a51497 158850f7...089863
4
IP Strategy AgentstrategyCleared

Cleared file

2026-08-18 08:30:00ZAuthority LG6-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
challenger-review@p6
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in de208323...b70e8dout 0a995d02...ce8c51artifact ART-LG6A-1007-4 158850f7...089863 77e4ae37...a988bd
5
IP Strategy AgentstrategyHeld

Holding at docket

2026-08-18 08:45:00ZAuthority LG6-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
challenger-review@p6
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in ee31da55...edd987out 1bd7100b...c0de51artifact ART-LG6A-1007-5 77e4ae37...a988bd a97a84b2...27ada0

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

LG6-AUTH-A1ActiveIP Orchestrator

Any unit on a ip portfolio line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Chief IP CounselExpires 2027-06-14
LG6-AUTH-H1ActiveChief IP Counsel

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Legal leadershipExpires 2026-12-05

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptchallenger-reviewp6currentStrategy office
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Committee decision
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the IP matter decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Chief IP Counsel · not reached
Instruct counsel
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the IP matter decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Chief IP Counsel · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

LEG-10Y10 years
Legal and regulatory correspondence
Regulatory inspection windows and the outer limitation period for corporate filings.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted while any related matter carries an open hold.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.