LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Compliance case at close

Legal · Compliance & Ethics · line LG4C · Ethics Case Intake. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
2
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
LG4C-1005
Subject
Owen Tanaka
Requested by
Wren Marchetti
Value
$52k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Chief Compliance Officer (human)
Sub-function owner
Chief Compliance Officer
Orchestrator
Compliance Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Conflict of Interest AgenttaskCleared

Cleared anonymize

2026-08-17 16:53:00ZAuthority LG4-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in e664fcf6...2f35b2out c958aef7...da99aeartifact ART-LG4C-1000-1 genesis 2d66b6b5...ec35c1
2
Gifts & Hospitality AgenttaskCleared

Cleared classify severity

2026-08-17 20:06:00ZAuthority LG4-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in d0bae56e...1021e8out b98327e1...544f2fartifact ART-LG4C-1000-2 2d66b6b5...ec35c1 ff471667...93e20e
3
Chief Compliance Officergate-approverCleared

Cleared assign investigator

2026-08-17 23:20:00ZAuthority LG4-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A0Retention LEG-10Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in 68517f75...5232f2out 15cde16a...d3743aartifact ART-LG4C-1000-3 ff471667...93e20e e8120afa...460289
4
Whistleblower Triage AgenttaskCleared

Cleared track

2026-08-18 02:33:00ZAuthority LG4-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention LEG-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 989644f3...400ab7out bb30993f...0a26a5artifact ART-LG4C-1000-4 e8120afa...460289 33e23d32...7a1ecb
5
Chief Compliance Officergate-approverHeld

Holding at close

2026-08-18 05:47:00ZAuthority LG4-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A0Retention LEG-10Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in 1d0961e1...ecb46fout a56e79b4...730359artifact ART-LG4C-1000-5 33e23d32...7a1ecb 4478767c...fd34d9

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

LG4-AUTH-A1ActiveCompliance Orchestrator

Any unit on a compliance & ethics line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Chief Compliance OfficerExpires 2027-01-30
LG4-AUTH-H1ActiveChief Compliance Officer

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Legal leadershipExpires 2027-01-11

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Assign investigator
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the compliance case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Chief Compliance Officer · not reached
Close
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the compliance case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Chief Compliance Officer · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

LEG-10Y10 years
Legal and regulatory correspondence
Regulatory inspection windows and the outer limitation period for corporate filings.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted while any related matter carries an open hold.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.