LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Alert at report

Information Technology · Cybersecurity Operations · line IT7B · Phishing Campaign Response. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
5
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
IT7B-1000
Subject
Anika Lindqvist
Requested by
Callum Muller
Value
$22k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
AI-OPS spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Security Operations
Orchestrator
Security Operations Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Alert Triage AgenttaskCleared

Cleared quarantine

2026-08-18 07:56:00ZAuthority IT7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 31cab63b...64e50fout bad4027a...57fba1artifact ART-IT7B-1000-1 genesis 19ad121b...1547cf
2
Threat Intelligence AgenttaskCleared

Cleared purge mailboxes

2026-08-18 08:09:00ZAuthority IT7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in f1abca27...e59de6out 67ee5c6c...229ca2artifact ART-IT7B-1000-2 19ad121b...1547cf 7b304675...762b5a
3
Containment AgenttaskCleared

Cleared notify users

2026-08-18 08:22:00ZAuthority IT7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 72d9cb4f...412c99out d8e7883c...4e0934artifact ART-IT7B-1000-3 7b304675...762b5a 3a688271...eee822
4
Forensics Support AgenttaskCleared

Cleared block indicators

2026-08-18 08:34:00ZAuthority IT7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 54e5e7f9...df1303out c58218e5...50be56artifact ART-IT7B-1000-4 3a688271...eee822 8bf58cc5...0ffc8c
5
Phishing Response AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at report

2026-08-18 08:47:00ZAuthority IT7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in f34161da...5ea235out 95579cd7...5a34d1artifact ART-IT7B-1000-5 8bf58cc5...0ffc8c dc5df2cb...ddc79c

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

IT7-AUTH-A1ActiveSecurity Operations Orchestrator

Any unit on a cybersecurity operations line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Director, Security OperationsExpires 2026-11-15

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.