LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Application change at impact scan

Information Technology · Application Management · line IT6B · Application Release. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 2 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
2
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
IT6B-1024
Subject
Lukas Bianchi
Requested by
Anika Rhodes
Value
$60k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Application Management Orchestrator (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Application Services
Orchestrator
Application Management Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Application Health AgentobserveCleared

Cleared schedule

2026-08-18 08:53:00ZAuthority IT6-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 0343e5dc...8ab04eout 45943a6e...3d6efeartifact ART-IT6B-1003-1 genesis 15f4ebb5...fa2337
2
Release Coordination AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at impact scan

2026-08-18 08:56:00ZAuthority IT6-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in ada085ba...324867out 4bb421c5...d40fc8artifact ART-IT6B-1003-2 15f4ebb5...fa2337 a173ed61...009622

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

IT6-AUTH-A1ActiveApplication Management Orchestrator

Any unit on a application management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Application ServicesExpires 2026-11-03

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Change board approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the application change decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Application Services · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.