LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Application change at verify

Information Technology · Application Management · line IT6B · Application Release.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
IT6B-1014
Subject
Clara Whitfield
Requested by
Rosa Costa
Value
$45k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
IT spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Application Services
Orchestrator
Application Management Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Release Coordination AgenttaskCleared

Cleared impact scan

2026-08-18 08:29:00ZAuthority IT6-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in a302d92f...70a826out c05a957a...18e6b8artifact ART-IT6B-1002-1 genesis → 2ee7f207...cb9c34
2
Integration Monitoring AgentobserveCleared

Cleared test

2026-08-18 08:35:00ZAuthority IT6-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in d2897b18...33445aout 694737a9...e5121cartifact ART-IT6B-1002-2 2ee7f207...cb9c34 → cf5dedfd...380675
3
Director, Application Servicesaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared change board approve

2026-08-18 08:41:00ZAuthority IT6-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention TECH-3Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in 9e96a1b1...d4c984out 63996a21...8780f7artifact ART-IT6B-1002-3 cf5dedfd...380675 → a58ff68d...4ca111
4
Vendor Escalation AgenttaskCleared

Cleared deploy

2026-08-18 08:48:00ZAuthority IT6-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 81b9e78f...3b99a5out a1d59137...8f6363artifact ART-IT6B-1002-4 a58ff68d...4ca111 → 29619be7...d5a678
5
Configuration AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at verify

2026-08-18 08:54:00ZAuthority IT6-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in a24c4dca...0d5aadout ed830f9f...e7260aartifact ART-IT6B-1002-5 29619be7...d5a678 → 34168c8e...793279

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

IT6-AUTH-A1ActiveApplication Management Orchestrator

Any unit on a application management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Application ServicesExpires 2026-11-03
IT6-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Application Services

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Information Technology leadershipExpires 2026-12-03

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Change board approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the application change decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Application Services · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.