LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Device at image

Information Technology · End-User Compute · line IT3A · Device Provisioning. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
IT3A-1025
Subject
Priya Muller
Requested by
Marcus Bianchi
Value
$69k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
IT spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Workplace Technology
Orchestrator
End-User Compute Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Device Provisioning AgentgbsCleared

Cleared trigger

2026-08-18 06:47:00ZAuthority IT3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 96494a01...23dee5out 05853ffc...2c9f98artifact ART-IT3A-1003-1 genesis 5e0f5c02...2b8e93
2
Device Provisioning AgentgbsCleared

Cleared select build

2026-08-18 07:20:00ZAuthority IT3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 879ee0fc...5fda6aout 493a70b4...619030artifact ART-IT3A-1003-2 5e0f5c02...2b8e93 8ac24c41...a95989
3
Device Provisioning AgentgbsCleared

Cleared order

2026-08-18 07:53:00ZAuthority IT3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 037a27d5...38badeout 274bc375...d58d43artifact ART-IT3A-1003-3 8ac24c41...a95989 e0ac9b15...7b3613
4
Device Provisioning AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at image

2026-08-18 08:27:00ZAuthority IT3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 1b068a74...977e13out 4095080b...b10ce1artifact ART-IT3A-1003-4 e0ac9b15...7b3613 ae2c68b2...2ed854

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

IT3-AUTH-A1ActiveEnd-User Compute Orchestrator

Any unit on a end-user compute line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Director, Workplace TechnologyExpires 2026-12-06

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.